扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2008E1-SC-207
Unlike the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which carried sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries, a permanently orbiting space station will have to generate its own electricity.
the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which carried sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries,
the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, with sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights,
the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which enabled them to carry sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries,
the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which were capable of carrying sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights,
the flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, whose shortness allowed them to carry sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries,
题目分析：
略。
选项分析：
A选项：由unlike连接的两个名词要保证在逻辑上可比，本选项其连接的两者为flights和space station，逻辑上不可比。
B选项：with sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights是独立主格，其没有说明究竟是谁拥有这些power。若没有说明究竟是谁拥有这些能量的话，那么这个部分显然无法修饰the shuttle and earlier spacecraft，即，在本句逻辑上，必须是the shuttle and earlier spacecraft拥有能量（可以从主句的内容中看出）。
C选项：本选项比较对象错误同(A)。
D选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。which引导了一个定语从句，先行词the shuttle and earlier spacecraft在该定语从句中充当主语。
E选项：本选项比较对象错误同(A)。
很简单 做对了
补充Ron发的几个小点：
(1) sufficient + enough is REDUNDANT. redundancy is very bad.
same reason you wouldn't say "reply back", "added bonus", or "determined as a result of"
(2)Enough has two possible idiom:
enough to
enough for
Water was hot enough to boil the vegetables.
water was hot enough for me to boil the vegetables.
B with导致修饰的主句
1并列对应应该是shuttle而不是flight
2sufficient和enough成分赘余
3独立主格缺少主语
If I use "with" to introduce a noun modifier I do not use a comma before it so that it is "touching" the noun it modifies; if I use "with" as an adverbial modifier I do use a comma before it.
with 。。。。是独立主格结构 作为状语成分修饰整个主句，而无法作为定语修饰shuttle，
嗷，shuttle还有航天飞机的意思，纠结了半天shuttle能不能和space station对等
B 选项 with 引导独立主格做后置定语
B选项中，unlike部分没有谓语，因此with结构的状语不能修饰前面而只能修饰后面的will have to generate?
我的想法是A和D中选择，sufficient和enough冗余了，所以去掉。另外老师，with这个一定要是独立主格吗？i paly football with my legs这可以表达出我用腿玩球吧。。。(不考虑冗余。。因为实在想不到什么好的例子)
补充一下：
1、either you need Sufficient fuel for Or you need enough fuel for their flight. sufficient + enough is REDUNDANT
same reason you wouldn't say "reply back", "added bonus", or "determined as a result of" (see #138 in OG11, if you have that).
2、Enough has two possible idiom:
enough to、enough for
Water was hot enough to boil the vegetables.
water was hot enough for me to boil the vegetables.
但是 "enough THAT" is incorrect.
B的with+n+介词短语，应该是定语而不是独立主格，对比220题，老师怎么看？
B选项的with+名词结构可以理解成是定语吗？
unlike比较对象问题，排除(A)(C)(E)
［, with］结构中默认主句主语携带的动作
显然a permanently orbiting space station不会发出with后面的动作，排除(B)，则(D)正确
想问一下B选项的sufficient enough是不是一个重复累赘呀?
嗯，是的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
先用比较对象一致问题排除ace
再看b sufficient和enough 重复
独立主格的修饰歧义