Since the 1850s researchers have tried to show that variations in seasonal weather are connected in some way with sunspots, the outward sign of an increase in the Sun's activity. However, scientists lacked evidence supporting such a link until the mid-1980s, when van Loon and Labitzke compiled statistical evidence suggesting that a link exists and that it involves winds in the upper atmosphere above the equator which reverse their direction, from east to west or west to east, every twelve to fifteen months. This phenomenon is called the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), and although meteorologists have known about the QBO since the 1950s, until the 1980s no one recognized a subtle but statistically significant link between the QBO and certain patterns of weather. When the west to east direction of winds in the upper atmosphere coincides with periods of high solar activity that occur approximately every eleven years, winters in the eastern and central United States are very cold.
On this basis, some meteorologists predicted that the winter of 1988-1989 in the United States would be severe. However, the winter was a mild one overall, and the meteorologists' attempt to make the connection between the Sun and weather on the Earth appeared unsuccessful, until Barnston and Livezey proposed a hypothesis explaining why the prediction had failed. They argued that the prediction had not taken into account another important element in the climate: the more or less regular pattern of fluctuations in the temperature of the surface waters of the tropical Pacific Ocean.
Barnston and Livezey noted that when the water temperature is abnormally high-the phenomenon called EI Niño- the chances of cold winter weather over North America increase. The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal-La Nina-is far less common. In fact, until late 1988 no one had seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere, and high solar activity. Thus, according to Barnston and Livezey, La Nina canceled out the effect of the other two climatic factors and caused the mild winter of 1988-1989. Although this hypothesis is plausible, much research remains to be done before meteorologists can establish and explain the effects of increased solar activity on seasonal weather changes.
The passage provides information to support which of the following statements about La Nina?
Its occurrence is more likely to coincide with periods of high solar activity rather than low solar activity
It is more likely to occur when the winds in the upper atmosphere above the equator are blowing from the west rather than from the east
It occurs more frequently than do shifts in the winds in the upper atmosphere above the equator
It occurs less frequently than does increased solar activity
It occurs less frequently than does EI Niño
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
答案是 E。因为文中提到,La Niña的发生频率低于EI Ni o的发生频率:“In fact until late 1988 no one had seen the combination of La Niña westerly winds in the upper atmosphere and high solar activity”。
细节题
El Nino 海水温度abnormally high
La Nina opposite situation海水温度abnormally low
La Nina-is far less common La Nina更少见
E原文并没有直接提及,细节题要找直接提及的
no one had seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere, and high solar activity.没
no one had seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere, and high solar activity.没
The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal-La Nina-is far less common.
when the water temperature is abnormally high-the phenomenon called EI Niño- the chances of cold winter weather over North America increase. The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal-La Nina-is far less common.
我也觉得是e
觉得D E都对啊
是不是因为这句no one had seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere, and high solar activity.没有人看到过L和high solar activity已发生,说明L less frequently than dose increased solar activity.
明显是E,这题错的好不甘心。文章有原文啊:
when the water temperature is abnormally high-the phenomenon called EI Niño- the chances of cold winter weather over North America increase. The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal-La Nina-is far less common。
这句如果还没理解对,那我也不用考GMAT了。。。
Ron说选E
赞成选E
E说的也不严谨
E才是正确选项
答案应该是E,原文有明显对应……
The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal-La Nina-is far less common.
答案应该是E吧?
I share your view.
这个我也觉得应该选E
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Ron说答案选E?