As the honeybee's stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing the bee to sustain a fatal injury.
As the honeybee's stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing
As the heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes
The honeybee's stinger, heavily barbed and staying where it is inserted, results in the fact that the act of stinging causes
The heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, and results in the act of stinging causing
The honeybee's stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes
if you have "preposition + NOUN + VERBing", then "VERBing" is just a modifier, and can be dropped without changing the surrounding grammar.
therefore, the sentence should still make sense, in context, if you write it as just "preposition + NOUN", without the "VERBing" modifier.
therefore, the sentence at hand can be reduced to "... results in the act of stinging".
that's incorrect -- the act of stinging is not the result here;
you can only say "X results in Y" when X is an ACTION. if X is an OBJECT, you can NEVER say that X "results" in anything.
this kills choices (c) and (d), in which "stinger" is the subject of the verb "results".
A.this指代不明
B.主句缺谓语
C.主从句的关系,因果,不是The honeybee's stinger导致blablabla的,而是honeybee's stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted这件事导致的
D.同C,没有表现因果逻辑
b选项算不算无主句?
d选项不知错在哪里
我认为e选项中的独立主格结构很好地修饰了前面主句蜂刺的状态,作状语;而d选项只是简单的并列,没有体现出这种修饰关系,即导致蜜蜂致命的并非是the heavily barbed stinger。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B句子不完整
选项A this不能指代前面这个句子的意思,
选项B as引导的原因状语从句,使得句子没有重心
cd逻辑意思错误
对啦,逻辑论元