There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.
There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
Unlike前后的平行要注意
monkfish是单数名词,不能用them,their指代,所以E错
m
B比较的对象不对。A的句子被逗号隔开多了些,耐心读。
关于monkfish, fish的单复数识别:
if "fish" is singular, it must be used WITH AN ARTICLE ("a", "the", etc.)
i saw a fish swimming beneath me --> singular (1 fish)
i saw fish swimming beneath me --> plural (multiple fish)
比较/which指代/代词指代
unlike始终是要和主语比的...e选项貌似很低 其实问题很大
E. Unlike比较双方不可比;前面there be句型是主系表结构,所以后面contributing不能表示伴随结构,而是作为形容词修饰前面的名词catching monkfish;用because引导的原因状语从句来表示方式太过于累赘。
a和e之间: a的句末是noun+ noun modifier, e的句末是 comma+Ving,这两者差别是前者表示原因,后者表示结果
句意想表达的是原因,e选项的形式是结果但其实又在表达原因所以很奇怪
B. unlike的两个对象不可比(sizev.s.monkfish)
d/e. unlike比较双方不可比
C. which不能指代一句话;应该用their来指代monkfish,因为monkfish前面没有冠词,所以是复数。
though overfishing不会表达出一种overfish这个动作是circumstance发出的吗?
A选项正确,对比legal limits on the size of monkfish(that can be caught) 和legal limits for cod and haddock。
B选项错误,对比了legal limits 和cod or haddock。
C选项错误,which只能指代位于它之前的名词monkfish,这样一来句意不对,应该是circumstance contributes to depletion,而不是monkfish contributes to depletion
D选项错误,同B
E选项错误,their指代不明,且对比对象不能对应。
my take away on this question is: no matter how crazy the answer looks like, you can't eliminate it just because it looks crazy. if there are more apparent mistakes in other answers, this crazy choice will be the only correct one....
此题一上来就排除bde,因为完全不符合like结构的对等关系
like a,B v c 结构需要严格遵循
同位语修饰一句话
考点:
1. like/unlike A, S.V.O. 中S与A一定要可比,绝对对称。
2. which/it不能指代一句话,常用同位结构进行替换,例如可以使用discovery/fact等名词总结一句话
3. limit的固定搭配:
4. Unlike 后面只加名词。
我想问下a中的their指代谁,谢谢~
一群monkfish
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
还是不懂为什么E错了,求讲解
说说我的理解:E项主句是there be主系表结构,后面contributing肯定不能表示伴随,而是作adj修饰前面的名词monkfish。但语义错误,并不是某种鱼导致了depletion,而是捕鱼这种情况(circumstance)。此外,E项里都已经有contribute to 了,“导致了。。。” 后面再用because确实多此一举了。
懂了呢,谢谢~,后来我看曼哈顿语法书里说unlike后不能引导从句,所以E中unlike也是错的,对不?
嗯,确实没见过引导从句的
那么 A 中的 “a circumstance ” 这句做什么成分??
“a circumstance ”是同位语
请问为什么主系表后面不能跟伴随呢?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E选项错在哪里~
所有选项中Unlike的比较对象前后不是同类型事物,都是错误的,且Because引导的原因状语过于累赘。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
错选C应该用their指代monkfish 没有冠词,是复数形式