Airport official: Local residents have been complaining that night flights into Plainsville airport disturb their sleep and should be sharply reduced in number. This complaint is completely unreasonable—there have been night flights coming into the airport from the very beginning, twenty years ago, and these residents should have taken that fact into account when buying their homes.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the airport argument depends?
There are fewer night flights now than there were originally.
The residents who are complaining have been in their current homes fewer than twenty years.
The residents who are complaining are ignoring the benefits they gain from the presence of the airport.
The economic success of the airport depends entirely on the existence of the night flights.
People buying houses in Plainville all avoid buying houses near the airport if they can.
我觉得这个属于方案推理的问题
https://bichu.com.cn/wiki/exam-point/方案推理
目标:买个靠谱的房子
方案:不在吵得睡不着的地方买
A选项与方案无关;B选项,如果这些人是超过20年前买的,那么当时买在机场附近方案是可行的,住了几年之后,机场开始有夜航了,所以方案不成立了,可是已经被动了--correct;C选项机场的盈利跟方案无关;D选项跟噪音大不大也没关系;E选项是最具有迷惑性的,但是下面katelynhah的回复挺靠谱:E不是结论成立的必要条件,把E取非,结论仍然可以成立!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论