扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-28
Mall owner: Our mall's occupancy rate is so low that we are barely making a profit. We cannot raise rents because of an unacceptably high risk of losing established tenants. On the other hand, a mall that is fully occupied costs about as much to run as one in which a rental space here and a rental space there stands empty. Clearly, therefore, to increase profits we must sign up new tenants.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
The mall's operating costs could be cut by consolidating currently rented spaces in such a way that an entire wing of the mall could be closed up.
The mall is located in a geographic area in which costs incurred for air-conditioning in the hot summers exceed those incurred for heating in the mid winters by a wide margin.
The mall's occupancy rate, though relatively low, has been relatively stable for several years.
The mall lost tenants as a result of each of the two major rent increases that have occurred there.
None of the mall's established tenants is likely to need additional floor space there in the foreseeable future.
老师不是说，方案找削弱的时候，不能给出另一个方案么，要找方案的副作用，可行性质疑以及可操作性质疑。
如果是评估或者加强，也不能说方案的另一个好处，要找副作用的取非。到这题，怎么就变成给出另一个方案了。
除非，就是理解成这不是方案，是因果，要断掉推出这个方案的因果联系，就是我告诉你增加利润是可以减成本的，你那个说成本不变，只能提高租户的逻辑是片面的。
这样的话对么？
这道题有点不太一样，它说的是唯一的方法是balabala，weaken就可以是有其他方法了
这个题显然是不合理的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论