Theatergoer: In January of last year, the Megaplex chain of movie theaters started popping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oi that it had been using until then. Now Megaplex is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Megaplex's own sales figures, Megaplex sold five percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the theatergoer's argument?
When it switched from using coconut oil to using canola oil, Megaplex made sure that the chain received a great deal of publicity stressing the health benefits of the change.
Megaplex makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.
In a survey to determine pubic response to the change to canola oil, very few of Megapiex's customers said that the change had affected their popcorn-buying habits.
Total sales of all food and beverage items at Megaplex's movie theaters increased by less than five percent last year.
Total attendance at Megaplex's movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.
文章完全看反了我的天啊,Megaplex saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. 是说把less healthful coconut oil 换成canola oil损害了销量。即使Megaplex自己说我的popcorn去年多买了5%。
要削弱Theatergoer说的That claim is false,也就是说Megaplex自己说的没错,我们换油就是损害了销量,哪怕上涨了5%。
E完美,去年影院上座率上涨了20%,你才涨了5%,按理说你应该proportionable的20%,所以是换油影响了我增长更多,这点增长只是因为人多了,而不是油换了,甚至还是油换了影响了我上涨=油换了导致我下降。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论