A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
B 税法规定的人捐赠的钱是这些组织的唯一资金来源 (那么即使税法在扣减应税收入方面做了改变, 也不会对之前规定的人造成影响, 毕竟这是两类人, 一类是税法规定其捐赠的人, 称之为A类, 另一类是税法改变之后对另一类自愿捐赠产生影响的人, 称之为B类, 所以无论税法如何变化,A类人依然要对这些机构进行捐赠, 那么就不存在倒闭的可能了, 因此B是对倒闭的直接削弱);
D 捐钱的富人是唯一的捐赠人 (税法改变后,虽然不再对富人的应税收入进行扣减,但是富人依然可能会捐钱,毕竟富人可能并不在乎税法给予的任何减免政策,他们只是出于善心,所以,这样不能加强机构倒闭的可能)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论