A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
注意体会其中gap的位置!!
捐款无法带来降税的好处==》many慈善机构就要减少慈善活动甚至有些要关门
一定一定要弥补整个argument没有写出来的gap:这些wealth people捐款的原因就是能降税,不能降税他们就不会再捐了。
至于这些富人捐的税总共有多少...占整个慈善机构funding的多少...等等等的都不重要
因为来自富人的这笔捐款少了就是少了 不可否认
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论