A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
一项税收变化将不再允许纳税人将捐献给慈善组织的善款从taxable income中扣除。因此许多慈善机构将减少服务甚至关门。问assume
choice a, 在没有联邦收入法的刺激之下,至少一部分富人不会像有刺激的情况之下捐那么多钱。correct,取非,没有刺激的情况下,所有富人还是跟之前一样捐那么多钱-> weaken the conclsuion
choice b, 个人通过联邦收入法的捐款是慈善组织唯一的收入来源。incorrect,不管是不是唯一收入来源,只要这部分捐款减少了就会影响到服务甚至关门。 choice d同理
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论