A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
[题目没有太读懂]
eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations意思是取消对慈善机构捐赠的税收减免,也就是说向慈善机构捐钱也需要交钱
逻辑链:富人也不能够税收减免了,所以很多机构都发展不下去了因为资金不够
gap:至少有些富人开始不捐钱了
错选了B 太绝对化了,不一定是唯一的渠道,只是说别的机关最大限度地捐了钱,而慈善这一块突然少了,所以钱不够了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论