A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
D是不是把它当成加强题来做了阿。。。假设题是得到结论之前需要一个跳板 把逻辑补充完整 为什么tax law有变化 富人就不捐款了 这俩之间的联系就是A 因为有钱人会被这个变化刺激 如果富人不管你怎么变化都还捐 那就无所谓你改不改 所以A就是个跳板 基于这个基础 才会影响到这些慈善机构 D是加强了therefore之后的结论
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论