A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
P:富人不再被允许减免;C:许多机构会因此减少服务,或关停
只有A选项明确说到富人不再捐原来这么多钱,直接弥补了原文P&C之间的gap,且取非能削弱结论;
但B/D选项分别提到了捐赠的钱是机构唯一的收入来源/富人是这些机构唯一的捐赠者,都没有【明确】说到是否减少捐赠的钱,取非不一定削弱结论,排除
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论