Two centuries ago, Tufe Peninsula became separated from the mainland, isolating on the newly formed Tufe Island a population of sunflowers.
This population's descendants grow to be, on average, 40 centimeters shorter than sunflowers found on the mainland. Tufe Island is significantly drier than Tufe Peninsula was. So the current average height of sunflowers is undoubtedly at least partially attributable to changes in Tufe's environmental conditions.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
There are no types of vegetation on Tufe Island that are known to benefit from dry conditions.
There were about as many sunflowers on Tufe Peninsula two centuries ago as there are on Tufe Island today.
The mainland's environment has not changed in ways that have resulted in sunflowers on the mainland growing to be 40 centimeters taller than they did two centuries ago.
The soil on Tufe Island, unlike that on the mainland, lacks important nutrients that help sunflowers survive and grow tall in a dry environment.
The 40-centimeter height difference between the sunflowers on Tufe Island and those on the mainland is the only difference between the two populations.
为什么回答都是加强削弱?这不是假设题么??
相关因果题:
C选项取反:大陆上的环境变了,让大陆的花长高了。——CQ4,给出他因
D选项取反:岛上不缺重要营养物质。——加强了原结论,方向反了
好棒呀
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
d是削弱了吧?相当于找了一个其他原因解释为什么向日葵长得高。而c才是用环境这个原因去解释。
相关因果题,这题主要纠结在选项D上,以下是我的思路
【P】越干燥花越矮
【C】T岛环境影响向日葵的高度
D选项说T岛的土壤缺少某种能让花在干燥土壤中长高的营养,言下之意,土壤+干燥影响了向日葵高度,能够比C更直接加强结论
这个题的关键在于,island 干燥,和island 上的soil 干燥的差别,如果 island上的soil 缺少那些物质,确实可以加强island drier-->长不高;但如果,island 的soil 中那些物质的含量和mainland中那些物质的含量一样多,在island空气很干燥的情况下,island上的植物仍然可能长不高;所以soil在这里是个充分条件,而不是必要条件;而assumption要的是必要条件,所以D不对。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
因为你忘记了它们是因为什么相关
因为你忘记了它们是因为什么相关
因为你忘记了它们是因为什么相关
相关因果推理。
相关因果。。。为毛不能选d。。。