扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-45
Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere. In this case, therefore, since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the author's argument relies?
None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product.
It would cost more to convert the production lines of the small companies to a new set of manufacturing specifications than it would to convert the production lines of the large companies.
Industry lobbyists will be unable to dissuade the government from regulating the industry.
Assembly of the product produced according to government manufacturing specifications would be more complex than current assembly procedures.
None of the seven small companies currently manufactures the product to a set of specifications that would match those the government would institute if the industry were to be regulated.
3家大公司和7家小公司制造一军用产品。如果政府规范工业，它会设立一系列制造标准，让这些公司都遵守。这种情况下，由于7家小公司不能承受改造产品线的费用，只有3家大公司会保留下来。假设题 ->加强，取非找削弱;
A. 如果政府不规范，三家大公司中没有一家会退出市场；说的是规范以后会怎样，范围变了无关；
B. 谈小公司转到政府规范标准和转到大公司生产线的花费对比；无关；
C. 说客不能阻止政府规范产业；跳出逻辑链，无关
D. 政府规范的产品装配比现在装配程序更复杂；无关
E. 7家小公司没有一家制造产品遵循的规范和政府规范一致；取非则至少一家和政府规范一致，那就不止三家大公司，削弱题干的结论，正确
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论