A study of high blood pressure treatments found that certain meditation techniques and the most commonly prescribed drugs are equally effective if the selected treatment is followed as directed over the long term. Half the patients given drugs soon stop taking them regularly, whereas eighty percent of the study's participants who were taught meditation techniques were still regularly using them five years later. Therefore, the meditation treatment is the one likely to produce the best results.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
People who have high blood pressure are usually advised by their physicians to make changes in diet that have been found in many cases to reduce the severity of the condition.
The participants in the study were selected in part on the basis of their willingness to use meditation techniques.
Meditation techniques can reduce the blood pressure of people who do not suffer from high blood pressure.
Some of the participants in the study whose high blood pressure was controlled through meditation techniques were physicians.
Many people with dangerously high blood pressure are unaware of their condition.
为什么是枚举推理?枚举推理前提是AB某一方面相似,结论是AB另一方面也相似,很明显结论就不满足枚举推理的定义啊。。。
我觉得还是
P:吃药的人不坚持吃,冥想的人坚持冥想(果)
C:是冥想治好了高血压(因)
把前提和结论转换一下,通过坚持治疗=痊愈
P:吃药的人好不了,冥想的人好了(果)
C:是冥想治好了高血压(因)
所以果因推理要么削弱因果之间的关系,要么说明有他因导致结果出现
B选项,是因为人们的意愿,本身就像要去冥想,治好了高血压,而非冥想本身
前提是80%参与者坚持冥想 所以结论对所有病人来说冥想效果最好 明显的枚举呀
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论