The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
A. 便宜和传统的单车不能扩大除非....(无关)B. 高性能单车将在小作坊还是制造厂更容易受到发展(无关)
C. 单车赛车员并没有对在官方认可的竞赛标准外的创新产生强烈需求,取非,赛车手的需求不受政府规定制约,那单车创新也不受政府规定制约。(正确,说明赛车手和机构的关系)D. 单车技术保守的原因是单车制造商想制造一个放之四海而皆准的产品(提出不创新的他因,如果单看结论,该选项可以削弱结论,但无法证明前提到结论的漏洞)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论