The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
E. 制定高性能单车竞赛的机构并不知晓单车设计的创新(错选E,首先知晓和按技术创新来定规则是两码事,其次就算机构按技术创新来定规则也不合结论,结论是创新受制于机构,自变量变量是机构,而这里变成,创新是自变量,因变量是机构。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论