The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
原文的意思是说:自行车制造商的技术守旧反映了他们设法去迎合的需求。真正对技术革新感兴趣且愿意为此支付费用的骑自行车的人只有自行车竞赛运动员。所以,自行车的技术革新只限于官方接受的以自行车竞赛为目的的标准。
前提:真正对技术革新感兴趣且愿意为此支付费用的骑自行车的人只有自行车竞赛运动员。
结论:自行车的技术革新只限于官方接受的以自行车竞赛为目的的标准。
问题:基于什么样的假设才能得出上述结论。
C选项:如果革新的标准官方不认可,自行车竞赛运动员就不会感兴趣。正好把前提和结论联系起来了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论