The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
首先,咱们在做逻辑题时,切记,答案选项不需要和文章的每句话都有联系,利用前提的信息去攻击或加强结论就行了。其次,对于这道题来说,选项E只说到了设定标准的机构没有保持更新,这其实和文章里面讲的保守创新不是一回事。文章里“保守创新”的意思是“仅面向赛车手的创新”,不是广义的“不创新”。因此,选项E并不影响文章的结论。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论