The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
这道题做一次错一次——
C:自行车手并不会产生强烈的创新需求,因为这些创新超出了官方认可的竞赛标准。和预期重合。加强了结论。取非,自行车会为超出标准的自行车付费,那么创新技术就不会被比赛所限制。
E:制定规则的当局不会通知自行车的设计。这是无关选项。取非,当局会通知自行车设计规定,所以重点是“当局限制自行车创新”,他通不通知都和创新没关系,通知了该创新还是可以创新,没通知也不一定不创新了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论