The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
果因
bike的技术革新→为了满足racer在比赛中的需求
Assu,搭桥
A、除非专业市场需求增加,普通市场不会扩张,无关
B、小工厂比大制造商更能让BiKe革新,无关
C、racer不会接受革新,如果它们超出比赛需求,CORRECT
D、技术保守主义的初衷是适用于国际市场,无关
E、制定标准的人不知道innovative bicycle design,无关
C、加强因果链条(CQ2)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论