Certainly, pesticides can adversely affect the environment in localities distant from where the pesticide has actually been used. Nevertheless, regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level. It is in the areas where pesticides are actually applied that they have their most serious effects. Just how serious these effects are depends on local conditions such as climate, soil type, and water supply. And local officials are much more likely than national legislators to be truly knowledgeable about such local conditions.
In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?
The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument;the second states that conclusion.
The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
The first identifies grounds for a potential objection to the conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
The first identifies grounds for a potential objection to the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.
main conclusion:Nevertheless, regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level 对农药使用的法规应该以地方为单位,而不是国家为单位。
黑脸1: fact,构成了一个对于结论可能存在的反对的基础。
黑脸2: evidence,用于支持结论
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论