A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected from a parent comet at a variety of velocities. These particles follow the same orbit as the parent comet, but due to their differing velocities they slowly gain on or fall behind the disintegrating comet until a shroud of dust surrounds the entire cometary orbit. Astronomers have hypothesized that a meteor stream should broaden with time as the dust particles' individual orbits are perturbed by planetary gravitational fields. A recent computer-modeling experiment tested this hypothesis by tracking the influence of planetary gravitation over a projected 5,000-year period on the position of a group of hypothetical dust particles. In the model, the particles were randomly distributed throughout a computer simulation of the orbit of an actual meteor stream, the Geminid. The researcher found, as expected, that the computer-model stream broadened with time. Conventional theories, however, predicted that the distribution of particles would be increasingly dense toward the center of a meteor stream. Surprisingly, the computer-model meteor stream gradually came to resemble a thick-walled, hollow pipe.
Whenever the Earth passes through a meteor stream, a meteor shower occurs. Moving at over 1,500,000 miles per day around its orbit, the Earth would take, on average, just over a day to cross the hollow, computer-model Geminid stream if the stream were 5,000 years old. Two brief periods of peak meteor activity during the shower would be observed, one as the Earth entered the thick-walled "pipe" and one as it exited. There is no reason why the Earth should always pass through the stream's exact center, so the time interval between the two bursts of activity would vary from one year to the next.
Has the predicted twin-peaked activity been observed for the actual yearly Geminid meteor shower? The Geminid data between 1970 and 1979 show just such a bifurcation, a secondary burst of meteor activity being clearly visible at an average of 19 hours (1,200,000 miles) after the first burst. The time intervals between the bursts suggest the actual Geminid stream is about 3,000 years old.
Which of the following is an assumption underlying the last sentence of the passage?
In each of the years between 1970 and 1979, the Earth took exactly 19 hours to cross the Geminid meteor stream.
The comet associated with the Geminid meteor stream has totally disintegrated.
The Geminid meteor stream should continue to exist for at least 5,000 years.
The Geminid meteor stream has not broadened as rapidly as the conventional theories would have predicted.
The computer—model Geminid meteor stream provides an accurate representation of the development of the actual Geminid stream.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 A。
解释:最后一句话暗示了下面的假设:在1970到1979年之间的每一年,地球都需要花19个小时来穿过 Geminid 陨石流。其他的选项四个不符合问题要求,所以正确答案是 A。
陷入阅读迷区,文章第一段说的是A recent computer-modeling experiment,第三段说的是 data between 1970 and 1979,我就以为80年代已经不算recent了,所以和computer model没啥关系了.........
是根据模型计算的 所以必须assume模型是精确的
题干问的是assumption。最后一句话给出了精确数字,说明assume模型精确。
5000*12*19/(15*24)=3167约为3000years old 电脑模型正确
rc
看清题目是问assumption--“Which of the following is an assumption underlying the last sentence of the passage?”
说出最后一句话所基于的假设是什么?
最后一句话是根据电脑模型计算的
问证明The time intervals between the bursts suggest the actual Geminid stream is about 3,000 years old.的assumption是什么
这个假设必须是基于twin-peak model的;取非,如果这个twin-peak model本身就是错误的,实际情况是single-peak,那说明两次burst其实代表的是两个独立的meteor stream,而非一个。也就削弱了结论
因为两次流星雨的爆发证明了the computer-derived theory中所推测的流星流边缘密度高中间密度低的pipe形态是正确的。
逻辑中的假设题。
AB:无关,是否19年都如此和是否完全disintegrate并没有被纳入计算的范围中
CD:明显不是假设选项