Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been eliminated by human activity: mining, livestock grazing, timber harvesting, and agriculture as well as recreational and urban development. The numerical effect is obvious: there are fewer salmon in degraded regions than in pristine ones; however, habitat loss also has the potential to reduce genetic diversity. This is most evident in cases where it results in the extinction of entire salmon populations. Indeed, most analysts believe that some kind of environmental degradation underlies the demise of many extinct salmon populations. Although some rivers have been recolonized, the unique genes of the original populations have been lost.
Large-scale disturbances in one locale also have the potential to alter the genetic structure of populations in neighboring areas, even if those areas have pristine habitats. Why? Although the homing instinct of salmon to their natal stream is strong, a fraction of the fish returning from the sea (rarely more than 15 percent) stray and spawn in nearby streams. Low levels of straying are crucial, since the process provides a source of novel genes and a mechanism by which a location can be repopulates should the fish there disappear. Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted. Straying rates remain relatively low when environmental conditions are stable, but can increase dramatically when streams suffer severe disturbance. The 1980 volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens, for example, sent mud and debris into several tributaries of the Columbia River. For the next couple of years, steelhead trout (a species included among the salmon ) returning from the sea to spawn were forced to find alternative streams. As a consequence, their rates of straying, initially 16 percent, rose to more than 40 percent overall.
Although no one has quantified changes in the rate of straying as a result of the disturbances caused by humans, there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption. Such a dramatic increase in straying from damaged areas to more pristine streams results in substantial gene flow, which can in turn lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations.
The author's argument that increased straying can "lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations" (see highlighted text) is based on which of the following assumptions?
A disturbance of salmonid spawning streams caused by human activity could increase the straying rate of affected salmonid populations as much as the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption did.
In the streams in which the straying salmonid spawn, these straying salmonid would amount to no more than 40 percent of the total spawning population.
Salmonid in some streams benefit from particular local adaptations.
Nonenvironmental factors have no effect on salmonid straying rates.
At least some of the streams in which straying salmonid would spawn are pristine, affected by neither natural nor artificial disturbances.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 C。由文章中的“Low levels of straying are crucial since the process provides a source of novel genes and a mechanism by which a location can be repopulates should the fish there disappear”可知,straying 可以带来新基因,因此 C 选项是正确答案,C 选项说的是在一些小溪里,滩钓的鱼有特定的地方适应性,因此在论述中 straying 能下降后代的整体健康时就可以理解了。
Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted.
题目+原文:高走失率-->基因浓度被稀释-->对所在河流的适应性降低-->他们的下一代的福祉降低
这句子就是很难理解,本来以为是基因浓度降低,但说的其实是adaption降低,也就是没办法适应的问题
从某种程度上来说这个assumption题也是细节题其实,要找到结论不复杂,重点是要回到推理文段去找到premise
”高走失率“导致了“基因浓度被稀释”,导致了“对所在河流的适应性降低”
“高走失率”导致了“下一代健康下降”
故assumption是,适应性降低会导致健康下降,即local adaption对健康有好处
Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted.
题目+原文:高走失率-->基因浓度被稀释-->对所在河流的适应性降低-->他们的下一代的福祉降低
assumption:适应性与福祉挂钩(福祉...)
第二段说高走散率,也就是很多鱼进入率其他附近的河道,三文鱼本身的基因就会被稀释,于是环境适应能力就会下降。
但如果适应了环境,就会对三文鱼健康有好处
题目说三文鱼后代健康会因为基因稀释下降,所以需要他们适应环境,才能变健康。。。。
我在说什么啊。。。
2、assumption题。
high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted. 高比率的走失导致杂交,杂交导致当地的适应性被稀释。
问作者认为高走失率会降低健康暗含了哪个假设?
高的当地适应性=高的健康度。C,Salmonid in some streams benefit from particular local adaptations.一些溪流的三文鱼受益于当地的适应性,即因为适应性,这些三文鱼才健健康康的。
there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption.
there is no reason to believe that A would be qualitatively different than B≠they believe that the amounts of A and B are the same,识别说话人的目的和情境,这里是说人工的会跟自然的差不多或者比自然的还高,而不是跟自然的一毛一样。
high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted.
→ lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations.
Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted
high rates-> adaptation diluted
choice c如果取非,salmonid do not benefit from local adaptation, 就削弱了结论
第二段第六~八行说了High rates of straying (HRS)会dilute local adaptation (LA). 第三段最后一句说high rates of straying (HRS)lower overall fitness (OF)。 补LA 和OF的gap
怎么看C都应该改写成:Salmonid in some streams will not benefit from particular local adaptations.
因为原文说adaptation will be diluted本身是problemmatic的,那assumption怎么又会是有益?
因为adaptation是有益的,所以基因被稀释之后才是problematic,因为有益的基因被稀释了,所以降低了后代的整体健康水平
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
. Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted.
any local adaptations that are present become diluted
可是这个题一旦没有注意到前面的小点 ...就很有可能做错并且陷进死胡同...考试还是不要太纠结这种题了
高straying rate =》local adaptation被稀释
高straying rate =》lower fitness
gap:local adaptation被稀释 =》lower fitness
所以没有被稀释的adaptation对salmon是有好处的,是higher fitness的
The author states in the second paragraph that what is problematic about high straying rates is that adaptations of the local population may be diluted. If there were no benefit to local adaptations, then their dilution would not be a problem.
increase in straying-gene flow-lower fitness
定位句Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted。表明stray增加使local adaption被稀释
C选项补全了gap
any local adaptations that are present become diluted;如果没有这种适应性,那么后者就不会变少
定位点说 increase in straying会lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations.
但前文只是说increase in straying会导致adaptions被稀释
gap:adaptions被稀释=lower overall fitness
烧脑题。第二段第六~八行说了High rates of straying (HRS)会dilute local adaptation (LA). 第三段最后一句说high rates of straying (HRS)lower overall fitness (OF)。 补LA 和OF的gap
有些杂交延续了自己的品种,算是一种adaptions benefit 但是被杂交的稀释了血脉,导致了基因流失是lower fitness