扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-SC-44
In 1982, archaeologists recovered Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose, which, having sunk in 1545, with more than 17,000 artifacts on board, everything from arrows and longbows to a barber-surgeon's chest containing items commonly used by sixteenth-century medics.
In 1982, archaeologists recovered Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose, which, having sunk in 1545, with more than 17,000 artifacts on board,
Henry ship Mary Rose sank in 1545 and, recovered by archaeologists in 1982, they found more than 17,000 artifacts on board,
When Henry ship Mary Rose, which sank in 1545, was recovered in 1982, archaeologists found more than 17,000 artifacts on board,
Having sunk in 1545, Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose was recovered in 1982 by archaeologists, finding more than 17,000 artifacts on board, with
Finding more than 17,000 artifacts on board, Henry ship Mary Rose, which sank in 1545, was recovered in 1982 by archaeologists and it had
题目分析：
略
选项分析：
A选项：which, having sunk in 1545, with more than 17,000 artifacts on board, everything from arrows and longbows to a barber-surgeon's chest containing items commonly used by sixteenth-century medics整体是非限制性定语从句，但是其中缺少谓语动词。另外，请注意，having sunk in 1545是分词短语，这里的have不表示过去完成时，表示先时性，即，sunk这个动作发生在它的主句动作之前。本选项中其没有错误。
B选项：过去分词短语recovered by archaeologists in 1982是they found more than 17,000 artifacts on board的伴随状语。其在字面上的主语为they（archaeologists）。但在逻辑上，“被考古学家发现”的是“船”。
C选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
D选项：现在分词短语finding more than 17,000 artifacts on board在本选项中做archaeologists的定语。在语法上没有错误。但本选项的主句是Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose was recovered in 1982 by archaeologists，从句是finding more than 17,000 artifacts on board（近似于定语从句），这是有错误的，应将主从句颠倒。依图形背景原则，从句延续时间应长于主句，即，作为背景。在逻辑上，显然地，“发现东西”是在“恢复船”的过程中出现的事件，即，“恢复船”的持续时间更长，应为从句。
E选项：现在分词短语finding more than 17,000 artifacts on board在本选项作Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose was recovered in 1982 by archaeologists的伴随状语，其字面主语为Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose，不符合逻辑。
B选项 recovered by archaeologists in 1982 为什么不能做前一句Henry ship Mary Rose sank in 1545 的伴随状语呢？这样的话recovered的主语不就是船了吗？
伴随状语修饰的部分要怎么判断呢？就近判断吗？但我记得伴随状语就是可以在句首也可以在句中和句尾来着
因为被连词and隔开了 所以只能修饰连词后最近的句子
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A选项：which, having sunk in 1545, with more than 17,000 artifacts on board, everything from arrows and longbows to a barber-surgeon's chest containing items commonly used by sixteenth-century medics 缺少谓语动词！
选了a。 which 引领定语从句， having xxx 是从句的现在分词短语
bc错选b，没搞清b的句子结构
重点：搞清楚recovered by archaeologists in 1982,的角色
1.首先明确b中“recovered by archaeologists in 1982,”应该是后面they的伴随状语，而跟前面的ship无关（因为前面的连词and），其逻辑主语应该是they，那么这里就是错的
2.误认为recovered是前面sank的并列，因为看到了and，这是错误的，因为recovered之于ship是被动的，不同于sank主动，这里没有被动语态来并列and，那么只能是上面分析的情况。
还是分析不认真
c同位语
c同位语
A、which引导的定语从句无谓语动词
B、recovered by archaeologists in 1982伴随状语，they found..伴随状语的主语=所修饰句主语they，而they又指代archaeologists，语意错
C、OK
D、finding more than 17,000 artifacts on board伴随状语的主语=所修饰句的主语“船”发现，语意错
E、同D
which, having sunk in 1545, with more than 17,000 artifacts on board, everything from arrows and longbows to a barber-surgeon's chest containing items commonly used by sixteenth-century medics整体是非限制性定语从句，但是其中缺少谓语动词。
从句需要谓语动词
漏看了and ：b选项 Henry ship Mary Rose sank in 1545 and, recovered by archaeologists in 1982
C with 可以省略。。。
视频里面 D 选项 讲错了
(C) When Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose, which sank in 1545, was recovered in 1982, archaeologists found more than 17,000 artifacts on board,
选项错了8
C中当mr被发现的时候，考古学家发现了17古物。后者是主句
老师，在视频中，讲解D选项错，是因为finding做伴随，主语不对；但是在文字解析中，说finding做定语没错。
我的疑问是：
1）哪个解析是对的？
2）像D选项的这种情况，到底判断finding是伴随还是定语？这个有没有什么判定的原则呢？
如果finding前面没有逗号，我能理解是做定语修饰archaeologist，可是前面有逗号....
d,为什么finding是作定语而不是伴随状语呢？这两个有什么区别，怎么辨别呢？
不明白a
D. The participial finding has no agent in this version of the sentence. The preposition with makes the sentence wordy and nonsensical, as it is not clear what is being connected with the artifacts.
这句话按句意理解，main clause 应该是archaeologist found ...., 前面的sank..rescovered都是为了修饰主角ship。
因此比较C,D选项时，从这一方面讲C更优。
过去分词短语recovered by archaeologists in 1982是they found more than 17,000 artifacts on board的伴随状语。
从句是finding more than 17,000 artifacts on board，如果是定从，那做主语的who应该是不能省略的吧？所以应该是伴随，伴随的话逻辑主语就错了