The area that Ms. Wahid would prefer to receive top priority for infrastructure funding received which one of the following ratings for its readiness for economic development?

For each of the following committee members, select Yes if the information provided suggests that the member would probably give Area 2 a greater priority over Area 3 for infrastructure funding. Otherwise, select No.

For each of the following areas, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the area's projected 25-year economic growth received a higher rating than that of Area 1. Otherwise, select No.

Assume that no two projects have the same priority. Given this assumption and based on the information provided, which one of the following maintenance projects must be either the apartment owners' third or fourth priority?

For each of the following years, select Yes if, according to the MRA projections for the manager's draft plan, the end-of-year balance in the MRA meets the owners' constraints as described in the Constraints tab. Otherwise, select No.

For each of the following years, select Yes if, according to the information provided, the manager's draft maintenance plan includes spending money on at least one of the two lowest priority projects. Otherwise, select No.

Community planners are evaluating whether to build a new road that is projected to cost $2.0 million to construct and provide $2.5 million in overall benefit to the region but that will threaten a sensitive local ecosystem.

In the columns, select Acceptable for each detail that would make the new road acceptable under the standards provided by both the economist and the ecologist, based on the information provided. Otherwise select Not acceptable.

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is supported by the information provided. Otherwise select No.

Based on the information given, which one of the following can be most logically inferred?

Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the three articles support the inference as stated?