B.时态错误,同A。首先,在此which只有指代了前面整句逻辑才合理,但which在GMAT里面无法指代前面整句。其次即便which能指代前面整句,which account for:说明(解释)…的原因,此处将句意变为了“关门是poor sales的原因”,所以不正确。
D.announce to do是错的,正确用法是announce sth.或者announce+从句
because of与on account of:
because of意为"由于,因为",强调因果关系,在句中仅作状语。because of 既可表示好的原因,也可表示坏的。大多数情况都是用于造成不太好结果的原因。
on account of与because of同义,但语气较为正式。on account of 非常客观的表示原因,适用于任何情况,可作状语、表语,不作定语。
注意整数和非整的概念!
Of the numbers in the list,理解题义,这里numbers指的是有多少个数,而不是多大。看前文。
题干给的平均数在numbers中的个数是否大于中位数(在numbers中的个数)。真的不要想复杂了。就是看位置。
看清题!
先审清楚题干,绝不做任何提前的“假设”,一定看清楚问题:
独立去看第一个选项行不行,然后独立去看第二个选项是否可行,都不行的情况下再结合去看下面的选项!
mark! 看清题,按顺序,是做DS的关键
对比句前后,it一定是同物指代(前后都是同一年风力产生的电能)
做对比局的时候,把as/than前后的成分单独拆开看,C选项是一个倒装:the case was in 1990
形容词放as前后都可以
claim的内容应该是一件事,而非是一个东西。what it claims is the ...= it claims (that) something is the world's...然后进行倒装,something that it claims is
修饰名词,表特征,不管是用定语从句还是分词作定语,只要是定语的成分,意思都是一样的
what=something that
B:but without growing在前面没有并列对象
mandated, required, and granted are parallel
A选项的without 很关键,题干已经表明如果实施,选项再说不实施就没有意义了。
Bossy Verb + that + subject + command subjunctive
倒装句 主语是the northern and the southern Indian alphabets
E,nouns have been as disturbing as compelling for ours. as作介词,接名词,把句子补全就是nouns have been as disturbing as compelling for ours have been disturbing,比较对象错误
B,nouns were as disturbing as they are compelling for ours,把句子补全就是nouns were as disturbing as nouns are disturbing compelling for ours,compelling for ours作状语修饰形容词disturbing,比较对象正确。
disturbing compelling for ours怎么翻译呢,
更正:
B,were as disturbing to his own time as they are compelling for ours过去令人不安,正如现在令人信服。比较双方是两个句子,they were disturbing to his own time和they are compelling for ours进行比较
extraction
n. 提取; 提炼; 拔出; 开采; 有…血统; 族裔; 拔牙;
独立主格是解释说明先行词的内容,T是一个什么什么样的物质
定语从句是解释先行词的一个特征,which引导非限制性定语,是一个什么什么样的物质的T,独立主格更优
设A、B、C数量分别a、b、c,求a+b+c
条件1: 400a+600b=4800
条件2:2b*600=2400c 得出 b=2c
解:首先,单独1 或者单独2 都不行
其次,1+2, 由2, a+b+c=a+b+0.5b=a+1.5b;由1 a+1.5b=12 (等式两边同除以400)
这样就解出a+b+c=12,问题是并没有利用400a+600b=2400c的条件=_=
不要主观臆断,和排队题目不同!