less than35作副词修饰after
b：releasing 主语变后面
c：in...状语 ， since...状语 。两状语 意思不对了。

倍数表达用twice/xx times as...as
Right: The man is FIVE TIMES AS OLD AS his grandso
表达某人有做某事的可能性用：sb is likely to do, 而不用sb has the likelihood of doing sth

-ING modifiers don't have a tense. they automatically adopt the tense of the clause to which they're attached

choice c, engaging in是failing 的一部分，意思错误

change in meaning: the correct meaning is what appears in the original sentence, namely, that the failure to honor promises WAS the deceptive business practice. 没有保持承诺本身就是商业欺诈 choice e, with its use of 'because', implies that the failure to keep promises LED TO (other) deceptive business practices. 没有保持承诺导致了商业欺诈

A: when referring ...& weighing 容易引起歧义-两个动作都是use的伴随状语, 选项E同理

AB:不能将because引导的原因状语从句作为主语

3.Postpone Infinitive or That-Clause Objects
Right: She made it possible for us to attend the movie.
Right: She made possible our attendance at the movie.
Right: She made our attendance at the movie possible.

转cd 看看D...基转因种子的 insecticide 是否过量...
不过量...那证明成本没优势，和普通种子一样...结果利润也一样
过量...那很好，证明使用基因种子其实可以降低成本的，只要使用适量的 insecticide就可以...相应的利润就大了

join in: to take part in an activity with other people,this wording implies that the rich nations are colluding with each other, metaphorically holding hands, deciding together to become more lax about pollution. (choice a expresses the correct meaning, which is that the slide is happening and that rich nations are individually joining it.)

The other problem is that the meaning in (C) is illogical. The organization wasn't given one name in French and then given a different name in English. Rather it was given a name an French and was known by a rough translation of that name in English. Hence, "known as" makes more logical sense than "named as."

There are two problems with the construction in (C.) First, if you were giving something a name, you wouldn't write "named as." For example, "I named my gerbil Ivan the Terrible," is fine, but "I named my gerbil as Ivan the Terrible," is not. The second example makes it sound as though I were impersonating Ivan the Terrible while naming my gerbil, and that would raise all sorts of questions among my neighbors.

结论：如果一个人的左脑受损伤，但是语言不受影响，那么他的语言中枢一定在右脑。

错选E：”如果一个人的任何一边大脑没有受伤，那么不可能判断人的哪边大脑有语言中枢（language center）“，无法得出结论。
E取反，无法否定结论：”如果一个人的任何一边大脑受伤，那么有可能判断语言中枢在左半脑还是右半脑。“

选项D：“如果一个左脑有多个语言中枢，那么左脑中风则一定会损伤这些语言中枢的其中一个”，可以得出结论：“如果一个人左脑中风了，但语言中枢却没受影响，那么语言中枢一定不在左脑，即在右脑。”
D取反：”如果一个左脑有多个语言中枢，那么左脑中风则不一定会损伤这些语言中枢的其中一个“，那么否定结论，即D为assumption。

思路：促销不挣钱---如果挣钱他们就更愿意提供更多促销了---不挣钱但还是要搞是为啥----怎样证明确实不挣钱----因为挣钱了他们就更愿意搞了 gg

well-attended !!!

and身后的不定式to make them decrease身前没有平行对象， and只连接有平行关系的对象，不能连接有因果关系的对象

A：兵马俑花费了7万工匠36年去完成兵马俑。them多余了。

note the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning......as example

Note that… as…

mark