especially if it has worked well in the past是条件状语。状语和定语均属于修饰成分，均具有就近修饰的原则。本选项中距离这个条件状语最近的句子是when they do appear。但是，在逻辑上，该条件状语应该是be committed to的修饰语

* makes it likely to miss...
this doesn't work.
technically, this would mean that "it" - an unspecified entity - is likely to miss the signs.
if you use the "it is ADJ..." construction, and the verb has a specific subject, you MUST include that subject in the construction. it is likely that the executive will miss...

assumption 就是 support？
evaluation 就是weaken ?是不是？

effect on the bottom line 难道不是清楚标明了会影响利润吗

搞清楚问啥

想问一下 so that身前used是一个过去分词短语，可以近似看作same technique的定语从句。 这个怎么理解呢？ 我的理解是employing和used意思重复了？

prohibit sb from doing sth是对的, probibit ..to do..是错的， prohibit that..是错的。

如果是 but simple random by-products 是不是就可以不要are了？

90. 8266-!-item-!-187;#058&005947

到底是什么

白痴错

看清楚问什么+1

1 唯一 2 不唯一

条件1设为 z=1，x=0.5，y=-0.6

peninsula=island

?文中都没有说道teeth 啊

The problem is that PIC can't reduce the number of policies that they have (which could potentially reduce the number of payouts they give out). The response to this problem is to find a different way to reduce their payouts (by incentivizing policy holders to install anti-theft devices).

以为是整个event mark

感觉2020好几道题都加入了分号的使用......

they指代 linking xxx 这件事不奇异么，they不应该是复数指代么。