地震是事实，地震是否毁掉了K是需要证明的

两个选项纠结的时候有个好办法是带回原文联系上下文来区分

AC对比，can（实意成分的缺失）
Whether的存在就已经在表示这些痕迹能否存在
这里的can并没有缩小范围，所以赘余

Recently, though, other feminist analysts have questioned this model, examining ways in which the condition of working-class women differs from that of middle-class women as well as from that of working-class men.
这句话算是博大精深了，
提出了working class 女性和 middle class 女性不同，驳斥了前一个女权观点——都是按照性别分的；同时有提出了working class 女性和 working class 男性不同，驳斥了传统的——和性别关系不大的
我觉得很难考试的时候看出来。。。这篇感觉长难句好多啊

看到这种大段大段的选项最头疼了

老师，一直看不了课程，老师有空的时候能帮忙调整下吗

neither "lake" nor "water" would be a legitimate referent for this modifier -- you couldn't say "the lake is more than...", but neither could you say "the water is more than..."
this sentence will only make sense if the modifier is allowed to modify the preceding clause, which talks about holding water (because "holding more" actually makes sense).

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

(c) amount修饰不可数名词，不能用来修饰4,000（drive-ins）这个可数的量。

was injured!

e.g.
i solved all the problems in OG12 in preparing for the GMAT.
--> notice that solving the problems IS ACTUALLY PART OF preparing for the test.

choice (c) fails here, too, since organizing the campaign (the main clause) is not ACTUALLY PART OF convincing the government.

The organic food industry has organized a successful grassroots campaign—using Web sites, public meetings, and also mass mailings—that have convinced

平均值和总数之间的gap

粗心！两次，不是三次

没有认真做题嗦。。。不管文章是否看得懂，你总是要认真去看，去找的呀，有时候不能读懂全文是不影响你把某道题做对的。

看DE选项第一反应ABC缺少连词...

注意start up和new companies的同义转换。

C最好，B用to have非常awkard.
又是比较级 than/ compared to | that of
网友笔记：（注意后两句possible的位置）
Dummy pronoun
3.Postpone Infinitive or That-Clause Objects
Right: She made it possible for us to attend the movie.
Right: She made possible our attendance at the movie.
Right: She made our attendance at the movie possible.

要读懂题
on the grounds 因为
这道题tricky的地方在于问题的问法——文章论点是易受攻击的，因为文章认为……
接下来的选项应该是讨论文章的逻辑漏洞，直接问你GAP是什么。
P——大家喜欢做高凳子看名人
P——大家再高凳子上不会多做逗留
C——引入高凳子会让饭店的收入增加
人们有理由相信那些坐在hollywod的stool上的人不是typical的，他们并不会逗留很短

考察比较级，首先more than这里不一定拆开用，且“than it is for”中的it 错误，这里比较级所以应该用that指代。