b选项应该是is时态错误,还有which指代是所有商店还是四分之一的商店不明确吧,应该不是which修饰句子的错误?
COMMA + ABSTRACT NOUN is allowed to stand for the ENTIRE IDEA OF THE PRECEDING CLAUSE.
B选项还有一个判断方法,就是相关因果必须要提到AB两件事或者给出一个能解释B的原因,然而B选项均不符合这样的特点
这道题 就是因果推理 因是-诚实会造成党派间的不妥协(例如提案通不过)言外之意就是 不诚实就会达成党派间的达成一致 ,果是 -因为这个原因 所以不诚实说明政府运作良好 问削弱 A 说 不诚实确是能达成党派间的妥协 但是你不能把这个妥协 上升到政府运作良好的高度 说的太大了 !
本题考查类比削弱,选项E为“讲区别”。
伤心太平洋啊,我的正确率咋这么低啊,啊啊啊............
主旨题:
A: is used to the explanation for theory A, not B
’two theories to explain why schooling of fish occurs in so many fish species. Because schooling is particularly widespread among species of small fish, both theories assume that schooling offers the advantage of some protection from predators.‘ 证明schooling help to protect fish from predators.
第二次做错 二选一 又卡了 ..... 取非
错选C 技术啊 技术 不一定用在这啊
笔记:women's [demonstrations] at rallies would influence men's voting behavior [X]
be dated to be是错误的❌,只能用be dated to✅或be dated at✅
一个倒装,即,In no other historical sighting这个表否定的状语位于句首引起了整个句子的倒装。由此可知,(A)(B)(D)(E)中的对比对象均是不正确的,答案为(C)
A is a better poet than B✅the better poet than❌; X is the better poet;✅
B选项:首先,with planets orbiting them是一个独立主格结构,其应改为修饰stars的定语从句。这是因为,独立主格是状语,修饰的是discover这个句子。在逻辑上,不能说“伴随着星星被环绕,科学家们发现了17颗星星”,而应该是“科学家发现了17颗被环绕的星星”。其次,最后的that were about the size of Jupiter是定语从句,最近的名词为them(stars),但在逻辑上,这个定语从句应该修饰的名词是planets。that were这里是过去时,容易被认为是这些行星“过去”和木星一样大,但现在可能不一样了,这是不合逻辑的。应该用一般现在时表示一个客观事实;
C选项:17 nearby stars的定语从句部分是过去时,容易被认为是这些星星过去被环绕,现在不一定了,这是不合逻辑的。
B选项:there is no 'be' in the second clause, and 'and' does not clearly indicate the connection between the two clauses.
D选项:'having lights' and 'there was 'construction are longer and unnecessary, this sentence makes 'there', instead of 'homes', the subject of 'having'; having lighting在本选项中可以做定语从句homes had electricity的伴随状语。在逻辑上,我们不能说“房子拥有光亮(home have lighting)“,只能说”房子里有光“。这是因为房子不能主动的拥有光亮
idiom: three times as much as变体:up to three times as much as/more than three times as much as/ less than three times as much as