典型的取非思路。。。在一定情况下，非A有好处——A在一定情况下丧失了非A的好处，所以这个情况就成了A的缺点

并不是有无关比较就一定要排除——去掉无关比较，说的就是贵。
yields of marketing value=数量*价格

问的是知名品牌能否重新赢得consumers who have switched to store brands，B 选项抹杀了知名品牌的优势

a说a conclusion 这个结论不一定是整个论断中的主要结论 本题中指的是那些人觉得银行不行了是谣言

白奇+白偶+非白偶数=？
1.白偶=0，算不出来
2.白（白奇+白偶）-偶（非白偶+白偶）=白奇-非白偶=0.2，算不出
1+2，算不出
e

以前员工数e，减少后是0.9e，以前e个员工总工资是s1，现在0.9个员工总工资是s2
减少员工后，平均工资s2/0.9e比减少前的平均工资s1/e多了10%，s2/0.9e=s1/e*1.1
则s2=s1*0.99

E错误，第二个不是一个situation need to be changed, 而是一个judgement给接下来要提出的更好的一个strategy作铺垫

6-n1+6-n2+6-n3=18-n1+n2+n3小于等于6，其中n1，n2和n3在1到5之间包含1和5，问18-n1+n2+n3最小是多少，n1+n2+n3最大就好，都取5就是15，18-15=3

C: Newspaper had lower circulation in six months than (newspaper had) in a similar period a year earlier. 平行

D: Newspaper had lower circulation in six months than that (circulation) in a similar period a year earlier. 不平行

求问，B答案的对应句是文章哪句？
Thanks in advance.

"rules intending..." is incorrect, since the rules aren't intending to do anything. rules don't have intentions, although their authors do.
this is a passive type construction. the rules are intended to do x, y, and z, so you need "intended", not "intending".

这道题怎么也不会选a啊，alongwith的问题摆在那另外like的用法也错了，最重要的是有更好的答案

The acts of Congress：国会立法案，有public laws，也有private laws。本题只要理解国会立法案不仅仅只有一个。。。这个知道了就知道为啥E不对了。。。

A选项的had entered和were时态不一致也可以么？

evolved和feelings are时态不一致也可以么？

将三个式子都进行平方，之后在进行比较

E错在
The second part described something that happened later. Not something that happened as the WP was "moving into the first rank of xxxx".
E.g.,
Arriving in Seoul for the first time, I was confused by the addresses, which had no apparent relationship to street names.
"”> I was confused when I first arrived in Seoul.

After long years of indifferent reception by the scientific community整个是一个时间状语，修饰has now been acknowledged to be

B和C再比，B中be allowed的是to remove和replace，C中be allowed的是restorers，allow sb do sth，C更合理

B和C比，B没有指明to remove和replace的逻辑主语，C指明了是restorers remove和replace