比较关心 在没有a选项或者a选项是错误的情况下都怎么去justify D选项的正确性… 尤其是是毕老师解释的“状态的切换” “动作的始终”
D选项,讲的是 improvement of mail quality, 已经跳脱了“要精准定位用户”但这个讨论范畴,没有E选项好,虽然E选项带other...
C与A相比,感觉更在那条推理的逻辑线上
考察反向推理和保真推理能力
对选项B进行取非 -- Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is NOT likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years -- 相当于是with congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow....从方案推理的3个CQ来看,这个选项并不能削弱任何一个,即便城市的交通增加,这个方案还是有可能成功的啊。 C选项不能因为看到“in other urban area" 而排除。
A选项,引入了无关的变量 - 业余爱好者amateurs
此题的相关因果推理逻辑是:A与B相关,但A不是B的原因,问增强。相当于正常相关因果推理逻辑:A与B相关,A推出B的削弱。
此外,正确的答案选择应该同时提及因和果,即负面影响和观众减少,反例如B,虽然有提及负面影响,但即便原来是常规读者,依然有可能在这次负面中脱粉呐,而选项中并没有提及果。
错选A...b没仔细读。The point could make sense even if the frequency of night flights hasn't changed. 重点是问题问的是官方结论的assumption,而不是想要加强或者削弱什么观点
这题A也是正确答案啊,R也必须大于等于-5啊!!!
k is an integer
1个罐子的橘子+3个罐子的水=orange juice
n=2,4
(A) which引导的定语从句缺少谓语动词。
(B) extended被动形式错,句意变成了highway被延伸了,实际上延伸是highway主动发出的动作; extended和over 2500 miles变得没有关系,显然不是合理的句子结构安排。
(C) 整个句子缺少谓语动词;extended被动错句意变成了highway被延伸了,实际上延伸是highway主动发出的动作;in length也是做定语不如long简洁,虽然XXX miles in length的表达形式是正确的。
(D) being使用wordy;in length不如long简洁;was extended变成和was the Incan highway平行,结构不合理,且was extended被动使用不当。
(E) Correct;Extending做状语修饰主句。
(A) possibility和for的搭配错,应该是possibility of doing sth/that.; it指代错误,不能指代复数名词brewed leaves,有疑似指代subject的嫌疑;
(B) possibility和to do的搭配错;it指代错误,不能指代复数名词brewed leaves,有疑似指代subject的嫌疑;
(C) 同位语从句possibility that不如possibility of doing简洁;prevents and inhibits 不符合逻辑,应改为or;it指代错误,不能指代复数名词brewed leaves,有疑似指代subject的嫌疑;
(D) 用possible修饰preventing是动名词用法,不如用自有名词,idiomatic; 和主句的in doing不能保持平行;
(E) Correct;besides在这里是副词的用法,preventing or inhibiting和主句的reducing保持平行;
(A) one quarter加后面的部分应该是一个可数项,而less修饰不可数名词
(B) Correcet;补全省略即there are fewer than one-quarter as many (as there were in the late 1950s); fewer修饰可数名词正确;
(C) amount修饰不可数名词,不能用来修饰4,000(drive-ins)这个可数的量。
(D) the number指代不清;the amount指代不清,只能修饰不可数名词;
(E) it没有指代对象,that amount指代4,000 drive-ins错。
A:现代科技 能使小车在现在比在过去省油。语义存在逻辑错误
1) date….to 可追溯sth到...几年,强调发生的时间点,后面是ago
2) date….at 年代判定、鉴别/年份有….年之久,强调发生到现在经过的时间有多长,后面是old
GMAT likes "dated at" but "estimated to be"
GMAT is annoying at times.
we do not need "such" because we are referring to a specific group and not to examples similar to that or any other group. the narrowing of the category of borrowers has nothing to do with it
在OG2017 verbal分册遇到一个正确句子 (No.273): The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million as part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer in the office color-printing market.
这里as a part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer 可不可以说成as a part of deal to make it the largest manufacturer ?
感觉是可以的… 因为主句动作的发生与否会对从句造成影响啊