这题还是有点小绕,虽然对了但是用时超了。
明显是E,这题错的好不甘心。文章有原文啊:
E选项 曼哈顿说避免用Y of X‘s
C选项 主句:NB是一个记者,修饰语:这个人(主语) includes(谓语) circling(宾语)...in her exploits(宾补),语法没问题,但是语义上太绕了,直接像B一样说exploits includes circling就行了
气候变暖(A)还是人类迁徙(B)导致动物灭绝?原本意思A发生,B发生,所以C发生。到底是A导致的还是B导致的。
Just as … , so … Just as you sow, so you will reap
为什么c选项不能看成with只接了companies 是个名词 而后面从句that修饰companies?
amounting to的用法没问题,但是逻辑主语是the price,这个是有问题的
amount
a的比较对象有问题,the price和cars and trucks不能比较,amounting to没问题
this sort of construction -- comma + "or" + noun -- is used when you have two equivalent formulations of something, and you are trying to introduce the fact that they are equivalent.
应该是an=2an-1-x, a5=2a4-x, a4=2a3-x
假设红签长为R, W里的平均长为R+18, V里的平均长为R-6. (R+18)-(R-6)=24.
'remainder' and 'balance' mean 'the rest of the stuff'. in other words, these words exist specifically to convey the notion of 'NOT everything'.
The real problem with D is "the rest of the 9 inches". This construction implies that 9 inches is the total.
if you've got a fraction of NOUN or a percentage of NOUN, you retain the singular/plural nature of NOUN.
choice e literally says that the usage of spices is 'in small quantities', which is not the proper message. this could mean that you don't use spices very often, but, when you do, you dump 14 kilos of allspice and 12 kilos of paprika in your pan.
C:
(1995 salay-1994 salary)/1994 salary.