老师呢

理解一个点就很好做题了.... 广告并不是只投放在S杂志上的。

我觉得主要是看题意"Rejecting the apprenticeship model of training social workers in philanthropic agencies,"强调Edith Abbott的观点是社会工作教育应该在大学而非在agencies，where对大学的作用再做修饰，逻辑就对了

have the possibility of doing something

1.equally和as…as…均表示两者相等的含义，但是不能用equally…as…
2.整句话补全，就是Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are （likely to exceed) the current one
3.be likely to do为习惯表达，不能用be likely that

og解释是it ambiguous，

这道题也错过不止一次了，不过这次是最后要来不及了没怎么看。
仔细读2就会发现它的结构最对了

原文：It is true that Switzerland's urbanized cantons (political subdivisions)............. and strong leftist parties—that may help to explain this phenomenon.
A：同义改写，shared characteristics other than urbanization=“ shared other characteristics—similar linguistic backgrounds and strong leftist parties” ， may help to explain this phenomenon=ay have contributed to their implementation of women's suffrage.
C：曲解原文意思，并没有share RURAL CANTONS characteristics

从比较对象和代词指代能够选出C选项；
可是C选项的“ do those of any other animal yet tested”， DO的位置太奇怪了，不应该在后面吗？

b改成having the ability to survive之后放到主语前面会不会更好？

D this 可以只指代provisions of the new maritime code中的code吗？

原文内容着重强调两种Skills的对比，如果选D，那么willing to admit that they lack computer skills or other technical skills就变为可删除的插入语，对比意思就不那么强烈。与D相比，C虽然有名词和动名词的区别，但是语法和语义上都表达的更为完整。所以，选C不是更好吗？

D. The locomotion of black bears is significantly more efficient than the locomotion of sloth bears.（因为black bear行动比sloth bear更efficient，所以black 可以行动了不代表sloth就可以了，可以削弱作者idea）
E. The habitat of black bears consists of terrain that is significantly more varied than that of the habitat of sloth bears.（与题干逻辑方向不符：变成加强，black bear领域更复杂都会自己走了，那么sloth bear领域更简单的，应该也会走了）

弱加强

老师好，我想确认下自己的理解是否有道理，E选项的定语从句single drops that have no taste or odor can be detectable和正确选项中的a single tasteless and odorless drop can be detected在句意上有区别，E选项看起来说有很多drop，只有其中无味的drop can be detectable；而正确选项用形容词修饰drop，逻辑比较合理？

攻击了前提

the time required for a stroke is exactly equal to the time interval between strokes。认真读题。阅读需加强

想了半天..应该是因果推理吧。。有一个细菌在同一星球就相似的理论，推得地球上的细菌都是地球上的，就算有过火星来的也灭绝了。然后most vulnerable的地方是，也存在地球上的细菌都来自火星这种可能

请教下为什么having been based on crashes 不能做 company's research 的同位语？