average people = normal people 文中说normal conditions (得病的人中)
by analogy, we can see that this answer choice has (or at least primarily suggests) the incorrect meaning: a two-year low level would be a low level that lasted for two years. that's not the intended meaning in the problem.
谢谢Ron大神的搬运工!
越做模考越觉得以前做的题目带来的影响太大了。。。已经提前体会鸡精反噬了@。@
这句话是什么意思呀( ⊙ o ⊙ )!
就是说这道题目我之前看过相似的老题目,就用老题目的思路去解答,但是...用老思路解答容易出危险,然后就错了
soga
我也是,不打算看鸡精了,没做过的反而能做对,类似的反而做不对
我也是, 题就看了第一行 ^_^
其实这道题是问 根据上文 下面哪个 must be false?
我排除DE的原因仅仅是因为被动句;竟然没注意到意思重复了!!
原句的时态如果不存在明显错误,就不要去改原句的时态
错选了e选项不能过度推理现在有限以后市场会更大所以很有前景。自己脑补太多了。。
脑补相同。。
A In part should be partly. Use of the relative clause that their steers should
acquire . . . is ungrammatical.
B In part should be partly. Use of prepositional phrases is wordy and
awkward.
C Because of suggests that crossbreeding has occurred because the steers
have already acquired certain characteristics.
D Passive voice should be acquired by is awkward and illogical.
E Correct. In this sentence, the word partly is used to introduce both
reasons; the phrase to acquire certain characteristics is clear and concise.
这题我被暴击了!以为平行最好是句子和句子平行;结果答案来个不定式和句子平行!
备注:比较的时候,不要忘了 有些考点是包含时态的比较的
Thus is the most economical way to say this way, like that, as such, or in
this way.
没选E的原因主要是被thus 害
C是不是在陈述了原文中已有的一个事实;
完美的错过了答案
是ever before只能搭配完成时的意思吗?
这题感觉是750分的题啊,不知道说错没
这里B选项:非A推非B加强了结论,但是我们不是说A推B=非B推非A吗?这里怎么原命题和否命题等价了呢? 欢迎指正
你说的没错且结论正确;但是文章仅仅问你加强,哪怕是加强一点点也算加强;你的意思是要证明成立,那就难咯;
这题是有点贱啊;看了好久才终于看出来是因果方向问题
A Prepositional phrase following the verb
distorts the meaning of the sentence.