A. This raises the possibility that wild emmer wheat, einkorn wheat, might once have grown in a larger area and hence might have first been domesticated outside that narrow strip--contrary to what is argued in the passage.
B. If wild emmer wheat already produces high yields, it may not have been domesticated very thoroughly, but that does not indicate where the wheat was first domesticated.

If wild emmer wheat used to grow elsewhere, it might have first been cultivated elsewhere and reached the village sites through trade. Therefore, look for an answer option providing evidence that wild emmer wheat has grown only in that strip since it was first cultivated.

Reasoning
What would provide the most additional evidence that wild emmer wheat was first domesticated in the strip of south west Asia where it now grows? The argument is that since wild emmer wheat is only found in that strip, and the oldest remains of cultivated emmer wheat are at village sites in the same area, emmer wheat must have first been cultivated there. This assumes that wild emmer wheat has grown in just the same strip since it was first cultivated.

您可是首次点评我的回答，

E的being handed有问题么？原本看成是Companies are relying on的时态并列

相关因果，因为收费超过往返公交车钱，所以一定可以控制私家车进入city。用CQ1 干扰因素，所以b说city停车费已经很高了，根本不在乎这点进城费，所以证明即使A存在，B也不一定存在。

请问这道题B选项不是削弱了assumption（whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent）吗？

A 为什么不对，不是应该选下雨但也不一定导致丰收的选项吗？D虽然也说明不一定丰收，甚至可能收成不好，导致价格上涨，但是D与气象学家的预测不相关呀。请老师解答，谢谢。

代词it的指代对象为语境中合理的单数名词。本身其在逻辑上指代the mystical level of reality没有问题，但是，由于本题中the mystical level of reality和the material level是在同一个both and短语中的，即，两者被融为了一体，所以这造成了it无法单独指代the mystical level of reality的问题。

我觉得A的逻辑有问题，这里并没有因果关系

B: this distinction has nothing to do with the passage, which is concerned only with published work. (the distinction in the passage is concerned with the frequency and variety of publications, not whether the findings are published to start with.)

(e): the argument assumes that scanners aren't going to get any better.

大家仔细看，这道方案推理的目标其实藏在最后一句话。目标：keep longer。方案：比起早收钱，我们在丢货的时候收钱。削弱：方案可行性。这道题对中国考生其实不友好，因为中国人映像中家电旧了，都是有人花钱来收购的，在美国其实是主人要花钱找人来运走的。因此，现实中确实有很多人非法偷偷把家电丢在路边

前提：因为有compromise。
结论：所以functioning well。
这是因果推理。错在因果颠倒了。
是functioning well的gov可能存在compromise，而不是compromise的gov就well。

老师，为什么reducing不能是前面那句话的结果状语呢

这个正确答案似乎有误，请查看https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/the-nobel-prize-in-chemistry-was-awarded-to-t2267.html

听了课后更不理解了，比较不是得平行吗?我原来以为c选项前面省略了she had been，这样和than后面的就平行了。she had been Less successful after she emigrated to New York than she had been in。但这样又是部队的，这个句子和后面句子之间没有连词。
所以更不理解c选项为什么对了，都不平行啊

Now . Choice A - When new gardeners buy these plants, they OFTEN fail to take care of these plants. NOW - 1. New gardeners not always fail to take care, hence some plants do survice.
2. Experienced gardeners are able to take care so their plants survive as well. .
BOTH 1,2 gardeners will in all probability go and buy these plants again hence DOES NOT WEAKEN.

The paragraph mentions that Articles often spur sales of plants they describe, PARTICULARLY among people new to gardening - This does not imply that ONLY new gardeners are attracted to these plants. Some experienced are attracted as well.

for any two positive integers X and Y,
X x Y = (lcm of X and Y) x (gcf of X and Y)