看准平行对象,决定有没有to
本题比较重要的一点是能看出选项(A)的这个倒装句来,正常语序为:
a cycle in which personal computer users, especially corporate consumers, are replacing their PC's with more powerful models has begun.
这里的倒装是因为cycle的定语从句实在是太长了,放在句中会使得主干部分被相隔太远,不容易让读者看明白。
as opposed to是“相反”的意思,instead of是“而不是”的意思。在逻辑上,现在330美金的学费和之前的7美金学费应该是“而不是”关系,而没有“相反”的关系。
C.by including伴随状语,在主句中没有合适的逻辑主语,错误。
单独Including(特例,不表示伴随),介词,做定语修饰前面的名词instructions。
A、B,known as/to be在Europe后面是会有歧义的,一种是作伴随省略being,主语是bones;一种是过去分词作定语,修饰Europe
D、E,those重复指代了
C,强调了bones known就很好
recognition
-public respect and thanks for someone’s work or achievements
*in recognition of something
eg:He was presented with a gold watch in recognition of his service to the company.
when placing them with others of their species, then,主语是locust,locust不能主动placing locust
平行
选项A:by far surpass those of pieces中的代词those应该改为that。这是因为,比较对象应该是两种玻璃的一些碎片的质量,而quality是单数名词,应该用that of。
选项E:Correct.本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。not only身后的with regard to和but also后面的in terms of是两个平行的介词短语。请注意,平行要求的并不是介词相同,而是同样都是一个成分。比如,本选项中,not only和but also之间都是介词短语,这就是平行的,而不要求介词严格一样。
需要考虑to do的逻辑主语
C选项whereas后面没有spend的主语,不构成和前句的逻辑关系。
E选项,划线部分的意思应该是他用voice就像是其他人用乐器一样,如果是like的话,意思就变成他用voice就像是用乐器一样,意思变了。
during身后需要连接一个独立而确定的时间段(例如five years),而不能连接类似于recent times这样的模糊时间
"Up" is redundant, since "until" already carries this meaning.
• The sentence implies that the Inuit are no longer nomads.
If they were still nomads, the sentence wouldn't say "until recently"; it would say "until now" (or some equivalent). Remember that "recently", albeit not too long ago, is still a time in the past.
So, you need the past tense.
more than three times as many 【independent institutions of higher education charge tuition and fees of under $8,000 a year 】as 【 ( independent institutions of higher education) charge over $16,000】.
选项A:首先,since应改为over。介词since身后只能接时间点而不能接时间段。例如:
since 1989, since today
over身后通常接时间段,例如:
over 3 days, over one month.
因此,由于the past few years是一个时间段,所以不能用since来连接。由于主语的核心词movement是一个单数名词,需将have改为has。
Both the Federal Reserve's decision and investors' speculation helped to bolster the dollar.
DE 墨西哥无法发出HAVE这一动作
同位语与独立主格最主要的区别在于:同位语描述的是事物的具体内容、特征,是一种解释;
独立主格 (with ...)则是表示一种伴随状态,描述与所描述分句同步发生的事情。
to do sth. 表示目的,前提是句子主语是完成目的的逻辑主语.
在这里,句子主语是evidence,但是它并不能发出classify的动作,意味着句子主语不是完成目的的逻辑主语;所以这里的classify遵循support for doing sth.结构.
The actual mistake in choice D is the word "arrangement". "Arrangement" doesn't refer to the process of arranging something; it refers to the arrangement that results from that process.
(Similarly, "as I was judging xxxx" makes sense. "During my judgment of xxxxx" doesn't, because a judgment is a conclusion, not the process of arriving at that conclusion.)