找准这个题目的逻辑链是什么,剩下的都是背景信息。这个题目说的是以前的要需要7天才能好,但是很多人三天就停药了,因此很容易复发,但是现在新药三天就可以治好了,那么肯定复发的几率会减少;那其实有一个假设存在,不管是7天还是3天反正病人一直都是3天后才停药(也就是三天后病人觉得自己好了),这样子E选项就加强了原文的结论;反之A.C.D首先判断无关,最有迷惑性的可能是B选项,但是花多少钱只是影响有多少人去尝试新药,但不影响已经吃了药的人复发的问题。
因为nontechnological发展阻碍了“real”经济发展,所以“real”经济发展是nontechnological的反面=technological,即选项A
文章说的是质疑在进行GDP分析的时候没有把非科技的因素包含进去.错选A,注意A说的是【GPD增长】的原因,但是在通过这两句话①“Thailand's recent economic growth, as reflected by its gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates”②“Yet by focusing solely on aggregate economic growth data as the measure of Thailand's development”可以知道,作者并不认同以经济增长数据——【GPD】——衡量泰国的发展。因此本文就更加不会解释【GDP增长的真正原因】了。所以A错误。正确D,这篇文章的assumptions是只有科技进步带来的发展才是有益的,非科技对进步是阻碍。这样的前提假设是不对的,文章在批判它
基本的平行原则。意思是:科学家希望能利用干细胞做些什么,那干细胞们就得 被 科学家研究、利用、检测。因此,direct、use、study三者应该保持语法的平行,答案为(C)。
错选A,把Doctors当做hope,use study发出的主语,没弄清应该平行的对象,实际上,如果是这么平行,三个句子就独立,但是二三句中的them是指第一句话中的cells,相当于基于第一句话产生的,因此矛盾,不能这么平行
A选项:由于整个题目中只有一个复数名词,所以代词they只能指代前面的这个复数名词—阿那齐族人(Anasazi)。但实际上,这句话的逻辑意思是:阿那齐族人种了一种植物,这个植物现在应该叫spinach。如果给call添加了发出者阿那齐族人,则其意思变成了:现在阿那齐族人将这个植物叫spinach。这是不正确的。我们根本就不知道这个阿那齐族人现在是否还存在,应该是现在这个植物被叫spinach,而不一定是被阿那齐族人叫spinach。
B选项:本选项错误同(A)。
C选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
原文一路逻辑顺畅,没有转折,一个obviously,然后therefore,说明逻辑同方向。
ABDE都错,因为没有argue也没有calls into question。
只有C,两个BF都是逻辑上同方向的。
sum of all even integer 1 to 301 = 2 * (1+2+...+150) = (2*150*151)/2 = 150*151
sum of all even integer 1 to 99 = 2 * (1+2+....+49) = (2*49*50)/2 = 49*50
required sum = 150*151 - 49*50 = 50*(453 - 49) =
404 * 50 = 20200
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:本选项主语是新陈代谢(metabolism),其是一个单数名词,身后的谓语动词也需要用单数来表达,were应该改为was。
错选D,错误在于表语上,因为选项的主语是rate,是一个比率,而表语是half,在逻辑上比率只能是50%(50percent)而不能是一半,即,我们可以说:
the rate of mainstream American businesses failing is 50%.
但不能说:
the rate of mainstream American businesses failing is half.。
正确E,真正要求严格平行的,只有both...and...等寥寥的“平行触发语”。类似于but,and,or,while等等连词并不需要所谓的严格平行。
A: so that错
B: and前加comma错,且用and并列破坏了逻辑两个句子的逻辑关系,不能体现是在大学提供课程
C: while错
E:being in错
A study on couples' retirement transitions found that women who took new jobs after retiring from their primary careers reported high marital satisfaction, more [so#reported high marital satisfaction#] than [those#women#] who retired completely.
In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."
RULE: if it's not a specific NOUN that can be replaced by a PRONOUN (usually "it"), then use the all-purpose replacement "...so".
more than的题还是要重点关注平行,前句是 woman who took...after.... 我们期待的平行的比较是... who....
这道题的坑在于D:自然的老化比旅游带来的损害更大,但是并没有否认旅游会带来更多的损害,也根本没有提到什么cable cars...与方案没有一点关系
E就明确提到了cable会减少对自然的损害
全文的结构是首先点明短期价格促销的弊端,然后第二段开头的so why do companies spend so much on price promotions? 来引起讨论,即既然有那么多不好的地方,为什么还要采取这个策略呢-->E
错选了C:justify:证明…正确(或正当、有理) to show that sb/sth is right or reasonable
但是全文来看作者对这个strategy没有明确的支持和反对的态度,所以第二段并不是在justify,而是说这个策略的某些好的现实意义
另外C的逻辑意思是,第一段都是给第二段服务的,但是我认为这两段是并列的
* "have a disinclination to recognize" is wordy/unidiomatic, and is definitely inferior to "are disinclined to recognize".
* if you're going to use "while" with an adjective phrase (while willing to...), then that adjective phrase should precede the main verb.
i.e., many people, while willing to... , are disinclined to...
* there's also a slight change in meaning.
"recognize that their ... skills are weak" just means that the people should know that they have weak skills.
"recognize the weakness..." means that they should actually be able to point out the specific weakness.
比较前后对比对象
led是“引领”的意思,显然对于conclude事件的约束力较强,需用不定式短语做宾补。
Split#1:被 reception 的只能是工作。去掉选项C、D、E
Split#2:be acknowledged to do , 去掉选项B
“unlike any other known insect” moves around
只有在选项C的位置,才没有歧义。
From Ron:the problem is just that it's not entirely clear what that sentence is supposed to mean. is it supposed to mean ...
... that no other known insect does the same thing at all? (this is the unambiguous meaning of the correct answer choice)
... or that other insects do the same thing, but not in the same way?
2a+根号2a=16+16根号2这个方程直接出来有难度,可以求根号2a也就是斜边。先写出a=(16+16根号2)/(2+2根号2),然后用这个表达直接乘根号2可得结果16。
如果kimberlite包含了G10 garnet,则这个kimberlite有很大可能是经过Dimond-stability field,因此可能有钻.原文“ For example, G10 garnets, a type of garnet typically found in diamond-rich pipes, are lower in calcium and higher in chrome than garnets from barren pipes. Geochemists John Gurney showed that garnets with this composition were formed only in the diamond-stability field; more commonly found versions came from elsewhere in the mantle.”