Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves short-term. Companies' hopes that promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify. A price promotion entices only a brand's long-term or "loyal" customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced. They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of their customary brands is temporarily available at a reduced price. A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have lingering aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to a brand's reputation or erosion of customer loyalty, as is often feared.
So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to management, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
compare the arguments in favor of a certain strategy with those against it
attack a certain strategy by enumerating its negative consequences
justify the use of a certain strategy in light of certain criticisms that have been made against it
advocate a particular strategy by arguing against an alternative
explain the effects of a certain strategy and the primary motivations for adopting it
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E。原因是,文章主要目的是解释短期价格促销策略对销售的影响,以及公司采用此策略的主要动机。文章中提到了它可能会带来的积极或消极影响,但它未提到任何主张。文章也未提及任何其他策略,也没有将这种策略与任何辩论或批评进行比较。
全文的结构是首先点明短期价格促销的弊端,然后第二段开头的so why do companies spend so much on price promotions? 来引起讨论,即既然有那么多不好的地方,为什么还要采取这个策略呢-->E
错选了C:justify:证明…正确(或正当、有理) to show that sb/sth is right or reasonable
但是全文来看作者对这个strategy没有明确的支持和反对的态度,所以第二段并不是在justify,而是说这个策略的某些好的现实意义
另外C的逻辑意思是,第一段都是给第二段服务的,但是我认为这两段是并列的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论