From Ron:
in this problem, if you understand PARALLELISM, then you don't really have to worry about those distinctions.
the comparison must be made between individuals of one genetic composition and individuals of another genetic composition.

therefore, (a) and (e) are wrong because "that" is singular; we're supposed to be comparing individuals (plural).
(b) and (c) are wrong because "other"/"another" refers to another genetic composition; therefore, these are faulty comparisons, because there's no word to suggest individuals (we MUST compare individuals to other individuals, not to a composition).

that leaves (d).

--

as for the distinctions:

"the other" is used when there are only two things.
i chose one of the two dinner options; my date chose the other.

"another" is used for another of an indefinite number of things.
usually, i'll order one entree and my date will order another, so that we can each try some of both.

"each other" refers to interaction between exactly two things or people.
my date and i usually sit next to each other, rather than across from each other.

"one another" also refers to interaction, but there may be more than two things/people.
the holiday season offers many occasions for people who have not seen one another in many months to reunite.

搬运CD alzn2765
发表于 2016-4-3 09:23:36
首先，黑体的两句分别支持了两个strategy，所以这两句不是同向的。但本身这两句话之间是没有矛盾的，不存在一个直接否定另一个，而都是用来支持某一个strategy的。
我们一般只区分是论据（evidence, support, consideration, fact,assumption）还是结论(claim, conclusion, recommedation, attitude)，一般不需要再去细分。BF题考察的一定是这两句话之间的逻辑关系（同向／不同向？支持／反对／没关系？），而不会去考察这两句话究竟是assumption还是consideration，这不是逻辑。
C错在“the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption. ”，第二个BF句只不过是用来支持跟第一个strategy不同的另一个strategy，但是并没有直接反对第一个BF句。
好比：
A：因为我比你高，所以我应该是体育委员
B：我才应该是体育委员，因为我跑的比你快
B只不过说了另外一个他觉得B可以是体育委员的原因，但并没有直接去反驳A说的A比B高的事实。

这题搬运一下Ron解释供参考吧：

关于A 是平行的：they're pretty darn parallel. in fact, they're EXACTLY parallel.
so + [adjective] + that + it + [verb]
both parts have exactly the same form.
incidentally—
the verbs are in different tenses, but that's irrelevant to parallelism.
remember: from the standpoint of grammar, ALL verbs are equivalent.
verb TENSES are determined ENTIRELY by meaning/context, and NEVER by grammar.
here, we want different tenses, because one of these things is something that's permanently true (it makes burrowing difficult) while the other represents only the potential that something could happen (it could cause tunnels to collapse).
this simpler sentence, with the same construction, should be easier to understand:
Frank is extremely angry and could start yelling or punching the wall at any moment.

关于D 是idiom错误：Is it incorrect idiom? as .. as to
yep. that's not a thing.
so (adjective) as to (verb) is a thing, but that construction doesn't figure in this problem. (it appears in choice C but is plainly not parallel to its counterpart.)

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/granitic-soil-t31897.html

with "some" certainty!!!

这道题选错只是因为太polite了

请问一下这道题的答案到底是A还是E呀？AI考题讲解里面说是E。。。

根据题目判断持方 - against concluding that the scientist's hypothesis is wrong ➡️ 支持科学家“shortage of iron prevents plankton from thriving. ”，即找出实验漏洞
因果：
理想结果 release of iron compounds into one such area ➡️ produce a thriving plankton population 而实验中没做到 所以考虑实验中的其他变量

originated in freshwater ASIA 60M yrs—10M yrs developed special kidney for saltwater
without the developed kidneys swam in saltwater but have to return to freshwater to drink

类比推理
动物园员工的过敏占比30%
总人口中的过敏总数超过30% ➡️ 给出此现象的成因（即 总人口 vs 动物园员工的不同）

⚠️ MEL提到的对象是 best candidates

背景：政府提供补助给企业，通过低薪改善失业率
因为 赚得少 ➡️ 所以 失业人员没有搞钱的动力去干低薪工作 keyword：financial incentatives

A 给出了financial incentative的激励方向
B 其他国家的情况 - 无关参考
C 这里讲的是people who are employed 而结论讲的是 unemployed people
D 加强
E 和financial incetative 无关

演绎推理
eye disorder患者受不了日常强光，视网膜受不了；对日常暗光不敏感，视网膜可以接受日常强光中的red components

B 选项混淆了成分 dim red light 不是题目中的dim light+ bright light red components

没看懂题
题干：G的研究证实P理论错误 ； 因为 C理论和P理论关系不大 ➡️ 所以 G研究验证了P理论（P理论正确）
The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption that （指出题干的推理逻辑错误）

goal：鼓励L市民提高存款数量
plan：长期存款限制提钱的免税银行政策
因为 已经有很多存款 所以 方案有效（提高了存款数量）

❓题干中主要的篇幅是方案推理，但是题目问的是“weaken the argument”,而不是“evaluate the plan” 所以我更关注的是题干最后一句的果因推理
【因为 已经有很多存款 所以 方案有效（提高了存款数量）】
weaken ➡️ 削弱根据因果关联得出的结论/给出另一个导致结论的原因
⚠️ D选项中的 transfer（转账只是把钱转到了银行账户里） 实际amount并没有增加；同时也说明了special accounts中million dollars的来源

1st company shun the use of title because...
2nd the use of title (advantage)

⚠️注意第一个boldface是shun “the use of title”，第二个说的是“the use of title”的实际作用【即 shun the use的负面效果】

P: 左脑负责语言能力，右脑也能用 + 中风损伤语言中枢，影响语言能力
➡️ C: 左脑中风但没出现语言机能损伤的人，语言中枢在右脑

D - 如果语言中枢在左脑，中风肯定会影响（左右脑）其中之一 【算是加强了“中风&语言中枢”的关联？】

观察未划线部分，and more...提示前面划线部分应有一个比较级作平行，故排除A\E
根据句意，发现方法与使公司看起来更大之间存在关系，用to do作目的状语合适
C correct

恐慌的应是一件事，用从句，故排除ABC
D的含义是：恐慌是这里有供应，不符句意，排除
E correct

A：both and固定用法错误
B：缺少谓语
C： correct
D：and之后的定从缺少并列对象
E：both and 固定用法错误

ABCE，比较对象有误

D correct