preference for, either... or... 需要有相同成分
不理解 得出两种可能值就不算是得到算式得值了嘛?
Statement1:
因为xy+z为奇数,xy+xz为偶数,那么(xy+xz)-(xy+z)=xz-z一定为奇数
xz-z=z(x-1)为奇数,那么z和x-1一定都为奇数,所以x只能为偶数。
Statement2:
xy+z为奇数,y+xz为奇数,那么(xy+z)-(y+xz)=(x-1)(y-z)一定为偶数
则可能x-1为偶数,y-z为奇数,或x-1为奇数,y-z为偶数,或两者均为偶数,此时x-1的奇偶性不确定,故x的奇偶性不确定
範圍(42500/86.4~43400/85.5)=(491.89~507.60),没法确定是否會在495~505之间
(1算余数的时候不可以约去公倍数。余数=约去公倍数后的余数*被约掉的公倍数。
设p=2a,m=2b,a,b都是整数,且a>b.p/m=2a/2b,因为a/b互质,余数最小是1,2a/2b的余数=2*(a/b的余数),最小是2。
余数运算定理:
对于同一个除数,两个数之和(或差)与它们的余数之和(或差)同余。
对于同一个除数,两个数的乘积与它们余数的乘积同余。
(5+7)’=5’+7’; (7-5)’=7’-5’; (7*5)’=7’*5’
两个数相除等于一个余数,两数同乘k,余数同乘k。
(5/3)’=2, (10/6)=2*(5/3)’=4
对于同一个除数,如果有两个整数同余,那么它们的差就一定能被这个除数整除。
(5/3)’=(8/3)’,则8-5可以整除3.
对于同一个除数,如果两个数同余,那么他们的乘方仍然同余。
(5/3)’=(8/3)’=2, (5*5/3)’=(8*8/3)’=1
什么是同余?
From Ron: "What" doesn't stand for another noun in the sentence.
In fact, the whole purpose of "what", in this kind of usage, is to refer to something that is not specifically named in the sentence.
E.g.,
I don't know what you bought at the store.
Please tell me what you did last night.
what 的單複數: it is very, very, VERY unlikely that the gmat will ever test this issue, but, if it ever does, then 'what' should be singular.
C: 80%contacted donor success rate/=好
contacted donors 80% are from (1)Old donor(文中表示此部分占多數不好) (2)New donor(因此這部分要維持不變)排除他因
(C)out of scope(contacted donors)
至于时态,我们用过去完成时来表示两个过去动作中较早的一个动作,这样可以使顺序更清楚。在这种情况下,我们有特定的日期,所以我们不需要使用完美时态——时序已经很清楚了。
Stacey:generally stay in the same tense unless there's a reason to change. This one starts us out with "varies" and doesn't give us a reason to switch to "could produce." "Is" is better.
A 不平行
用depend,而不是dependent
E选项不是和原文中的allowing them to grasp right-handed snail shells more easily重复了嘛?
破题逻辑:(不抠grammar,理科生friendly)
1因果逻辑:因为没标尺,所以估测是难题
2范畴逻辑:A is B :A范畴小 B范畴大。所以估测 is 难题,而不是难题 is 估测。
3不定式 VS 从句/ing:不定式:可控, 从句/ing:不可控。所以estimating 不是to estimate。
请问为啥没有按照 to estimate 和estimating(即to do 和doing)作主语的区别来判断这几个选项呢???
to estimate sth:表示说话人/作者有能力控制 估测sth;estimating sth:表示说话人/一般大众没有能力控制 估测st。
那么estimate the expansion rate of the universe 到底是简单可控还是复杂难控呢?
题目说了A NOTORIOUSLY DIFFICULT problem,所以不可控,选estimating。
可以呀,不就排除个A咯
把句子看完在做题!!!1
A: women based on错,robe that 和and that逻辑上不能构成平行关系
B:同A
C:robe that 和and that逻辑上不能构成平行关系
D:正确
E:indicate 后面少that,for dressing 是穿…去做某事更好,而不是为了…(语义排除)
Many commentators believe that this change had already occurred in 1871 when-following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs-Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes
although后面和claim一致,given以上,argument that 同位语,归纳
一些理论家和评论家坚持认为,如果一件艺术作品的审美评价是基于艺术家的文化背景的数据,那么它就不合理。这种观点显然是错误的。对艺术家作品唯一合理的审美评价是那些考虑到诸如艺术家出生的时代和地点、他们的成长和教育、以及他们社会的价值观等因素的综合评价,这些因素是他们文化背景的一部分。所以就是基于文化背景的评价是对的B是支持而非削弱C没有 an equivocal interpretation of key terms Deffect无关 E说争论能不能解决,无关 只有A对
substantial
a monthly salary of $2 000 less tax and insurance
重點只有Cicero reasoned that, however desirable the goal may be, a wise person could never attain it, since emotions are not simply irrational urges.
有情感才能達成目標 理智的人無法達成目標
gap:理智的人沒啥感情
the last day that they are scheduled to collect指的是他们要去收集day,不符合逻辑