It is expected that , or sb/sth is expected to do
In this case, we can say,
production is expected to double by the end of the year, and thus to provide or
it is expected that the production will double by the end of the year and thus provide...

with（也可以没有）+noun+doing（分词）为独立主格，是简化的状语从句，需要与主句的动词近乎同时发生。
the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel 需要满足同时发生的条件

The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.

在这句话里面，需要注意的是，应该是先有 lying produces emotional reactions, 然后再有emotional reactions create unconscious physiological responses. 因此，在定语从句里面，create对应的先行词是reactions，reactions需要用create的复数形式修饰。

The mass of each black hole is proportional to (that of) its host galaxy，前后比较的对象需要对等。
evidence that black holes probably exist at the core of nearly all galaxies and the mass of each black hole is proportional to that of its host galaxy.

工作才知道, 申请破产了, 就会被清算, 可以不用还钱了. 这是为什么会有申请破产...
一家企业破产了, 只会被清算, 法人和股东被清算, 但是能不能偿还所有的, 其实无所谓了

这种题目就按照逆否命题选出正确答案就好，从题干入手，根据“周四有五个特殊定制的货物被发出，每一个都全部由建筑用品组成的”逆否命题为“不是建筑用品，就不是特殊定制”，直接就可以因为T地的都不是建筑用品，所以不是特殊定制，也就是对应的C选项：所有的T地的都不是特殊定制。但其实题目可以更严谨一点。

我想问下大佬们，我肯定选b，但对c，如果没有其他小错误，which定语从句指代前面整个句子，主席指出乐观前景这个事情，暗示着巴拉巴拉，这样是不是也可以。逗号后的定语从句本身有指代前面整句话的情况

为什么要去解决extreme case（有很多10min，平均30min，那就说明有少量远高于30min）？为什么不是解决了大量就可以了，少量的not worth精力？

B选项个人理解是：如果最moral的选择是让机器分配，那无论是把简单任务留给自己还是别人都不是最道德的，因为志愿者都没有选择让机器分配。而文章是想证明大部分人在道德方面是“严于律人，宽以待己”的，因此暗含一个比较级，即把困难任务留给自己最道德。但如果B选项正确，只要是志愿者自己做的选择就都不是最道德，无法形成比较级。

Ａ选项错的原因是they没有可以指代的对象，而C选项用被动隐藏了他们，因此选C

A选项错的原因还是伴随状语的逻辑主语不对，manufacturer和plans都不能充当amounting的主语

根据Ron：based on, due to, caused by只可修饰noun（如主语），不可修饰句子！based on修饰的是主句主语
this is literally saying that "each year young Athenian women" are based on records from ancient Athens. That makes no sense at all. A conclusion or a finding or a report could be "based on records", but the women themselves certainly can't be. (A)(B) is out.
(C)the use of "according to records from ancient Athens" in this case is OK，the real issue is parallelism.
"……women collaborated to weave a new woolen robe that…and that this robe depicted……“ 后半部分平行结构nonsense.
(B)(E)中“had collaborated"时态不妥:I suppose that they collaborated before they used the robe to dress a statue, but I think it's awfully weird to say that they "had collaborated" first, and then the robe later "depicted scenes." 如果真的确定时态好不好，先判断其他split！

这题ABE错的原因是独立主格之间要有相互修饰的关系，但是这题只有加转折词才能有相互修饰的关系，本身的两棵树的特性不存在修饰关系

这题removing后面接名词就是动名词，接of就是纯名词

主语中除非是插入语有两个逗号，不然不能用逗号隔开

独立主格用来修饰主语的谓语 C选项shape与with的内容相反 E选项相同

This question is confusing because the verb "derive" comes before the plural subject, "both the northern and the southern Indian alphabets."

To understand how this works, take a simple example in which the subject comes first: "English and French both derive from Latin, which Dave studied in high school." It's easy enough to see that "English and French" is the subject and "derive" is the verb.

However, I could also have written the sentence as, "In high school, Dave studied Latin, from which derive both English and French." Sounds a little weird, but "English and French" is still the subject, it just happens to come after the verb. The sentence still has the same meaning, and the subject "English and French" still does the action in the sentence ("derive from Latin"). All we did was switch the order around a bit.

Same issue in (C). If the question writer had wanted to make life easy for you, she could have written, "Both the northern and the southern India alphabet derive from the Aramaic script," in which case it would be easy to see that "the northern and the southern India alphabet" serves as the subject. Instead, we have "...the Aramaic script from which derive both the northern and the southern India alphabets." Again, "the northern and the southern India alphabets" is the subject, but this time it follows the verb, so it's tougher to recognize.

B.得病的虫子少需要有更少的虫子吃耗子，所以文段结论成立的核心是增加其他食物能不能减少吃耗子的虫子数量。当食物充足不受限的情况下，增加其他食物可能使一部分虫子不再吃耗子；当食物受限时，增加其他食物也不能使虫子不再吃耗子，因此B可以评估结论
D.与逻辑链（增加其他食物使吃耗子的虫子减少从而得病虫子下降）无关。不管有没有别的使虫子染病的原因（成虫也会病），只要吃耗子的虫子少了，都能削弱结论，吃耗子的虫子不变或多了，都能加强结论，因此D不能评估结论

不是wood本身導致 而是整件事
跟
不是在比較年代 是在比較年代裡的動作

作者however後面那句是重點
many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive
在說他們真的需要這些補貼
而a選項恰好在說 他們真的沒辦法找到工作 所以真的需要補貼
一開始看選項會覺得說 好像沒有甚麼結論句或是可以著力的點
是因為看錯重點ㄌ