开头的modifier是"numbering in the millions",所以后面的wolfs应该是decline to a number,感觉这样能前后对应上。
subject是wolfs,后半部分的主体"11000 of them"还是指的wolfs,所以同位语更为合适,如果用with...的独立主格,独立主格的主体应该是除了wolfs之外的物体。
ABCD中unlike和in comparison with的比较对象都不对等
the moose's legs enable the moose to move quickly...才对
所有格名词 moose‘s这种格式的,是不能被指代的 it its that those...都不行。排除ABC
D中,enabling的主体是legs,不能做the moose has的状语
so that, as...as这两个是固定搭配,排除ABC。
values of the pinelands对应those outside the pinelands
柯林斯词典:Hopefully-ADV You say hopefully when mentioning something that you hope will happen. Some careful speakers of English think that this use of hopefully is not correct, but it is very frequently used. 但愿 (一些严谨的说英语者认为)(hopefully)(如此使用不正确,但它已被普遍使用)
payments are not expected to be...是被动的,没有写出expect的主体是什么。
ABC中是主动语气,表明了是the bank expected。
不会是which,排除ABC
D中的"releasing"是the water pipes froze的伴随状语,不合句意。
洒水器爆炸然后放水才合理。
ABC中的which和inflicting都是noun modifier,就近修饰前面的processers,但是句意应该是修饰gadgets。
D中,capable of doing固定搭配,指代injuries要用those。
{at least one}={total}-{none}
total: 8*7*6 / 3! =56
none: 4*4*2 / 3! = 4
at least one = 56-4 = 52
probability = 52/56 = 13/14
ACDE中的"their" "its"都有指代问题。
A中"though being tiny, blind, and translucent","being" redundant。一定是"thickened bones and armor plates" lessen the vullunerability
对比A E,A中wrote...in two letters,"in two letters"位置尴尬,是两份信还是两个字母?
E中"in two letters to the historian Tacitus"放在开头,在两份寄给T的信中,不会造成疑义。
我 刚刚
想问大家一个问题:求解答!
现在分词做状语表伴随,其逻辑主语一定要和主句的主语一致 如果 不一致 现在分词必须 加上自己的逻辑主语 构成独立主格结构 那就不是伴随主语了。这里的depending已经是一个伴随状语了,也没有加逻辑主语,为什么不能默认是跟主语保持一致呢?
这个逻辑的话,怎么排除AB中的depending on mass呢?
ron: choice b contains an unacceptable ambiguity: the modifying phrase 'depending on its mass' is clearly supposed to what the star is doing, but, in choice b, it could technically also refer to passing through a red giant stage. (in other words, one could read the sentence as though the star's passing through a red giant stage depends upon the star's mass).
即不是谁的mass的问题而是depending在可能变成修饰从句的动词,不知道有没有回答到你的问题
comma+doing除了可以做伴随状语,也可以做定语或状语,A:把depending on看成前一个动词的状语, after the star passes through a red giant stage, depending on mass,穿还是不穿取决于质量能读通;把它看成定语修饰a red giant stage, depending on mass,一个取决于体积的红巨过程,也能读通;说明depending on用得不好
要让depending on明确修饰star,就要利用有逻辑关系的两部分尽量靠近的规则来构建句子,或者像D这样写,完全无歧义
提问:E中的同位语a fact that可以被一个状语从句(是吗?)as there is in Britain分开?
$3 billion 是复数 哦
E他们没有在适当的历史背景下考虑1997年的实际人均国内生产总值 correct-historical context.
理解句子有问题
相关不等于因果,S和V agreement
but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. 这个方案及其目标是可以被其它方案来代替的。
所以C【第二个黑体字认为这个方案不能达成它的目的】是错的
虚拟语气,if + 一般过去时,主句用would。
D选项错在主句用了will,前半部分were提前了,等同于C中的if从句。
考谓语动词的非范畴化。
破折号是"a group...",同位语修饰,那前面一定是人"shareholders",而不能是所有格。
"while neglecting that of"对应前面的"the expectations of their major shareholders",所以不是that是those。