A star will compress itself into a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole after it passes through a red giant stage, depending on mass.
A star will compress itself into a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole after it passes through a red giant stage, depending on mass.
After passing through a red giant stage, depending on its mass, a star will compress itself into a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole.
After passing through a red giant stage, a star’s mass will determine if it compresses itself into a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole.
Mass determines whether a star, after passing through the red giant stage, will compress itself into a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole.
The mass of a star, after passing through the red giant stage, will determine whether it compresses itself into a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole.
我 刚刚
想问大家一个问题:求解答!
现在分词做状语表伴随,其逻辑主语一定要和主句的主语一致 如果 不一致 现在分词必须 加上自己的逻辑主语 构成独立主格结构 那就不是伴随主语了。这里的depending已经是一个伴随状语了,也没有加逻辑主语,为什么不能默认是跟主语保持一致呢?
这个逻辑的话,怎么排除AB中的depending on mass呢?
ron: choice b contains an unacceptable ambiguity: the modifying phrase 'depending on its mass' is clearly supposed to what the star is doing, but, in choice b, it could technically also refer to passing through a red giant stage. (in other words, one could read the sentence as though the star's passing through a red giant stage depends upon the star's mass).
即不是谁的mass的问题而是depending在可能变成修饰从句的动词,不知道有没有回答到你的问题
comma+doing除了可以做伴随状语,也可以做定语或状语,A:把depending on看成前一个动词的状语, after the star passes through a red giant stage, depending on mass,穿还是不穿取决于质量能读通;把它看成定语修饰a red giant stage, depending on mass,一个取决于体积的红巨过程,也能读通;说明depending on用得不好
要让depending on明确修饰star,就要利用有逻辑关系的两部分尽量靠近的规则来构建句子,或者像D这样写,完全无歧义
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论