解题切入点分析不合理。
A:consider A to be B及consider A B都不是排除点。1.the better ...than错误,不应该用the,应该用a;2, 比较对象不对等,
C(2,3)*C(2,3)/C(4,6)
Nice,你这个方法更简洁,谢谢~~
D. The phrase the business is inappropriate given that no business has, by this point, been mentioned. The verb plague is too far removed from its subject conflicts, making the sentence awkward and difficult to read.
Liable is sometimes used informally as a synonym of likely, but in formal written English, it is typically used only where the potential outcome is undesirable.
用了三分钟还是错了,这种题考试直接蒙一个放弃吧
whicheverresults in the lesser amount
竟然连开根运算都不会了😅
(2)x为质数或者x=4均满足
3000~3333之间(包括首尾)的3的倍数
前提是卖掉,所以要假设前提成立,会卖掉
E选项的意思是 即便每年申请老师的人数百分比在下降,但是他们的总数仍然比老师岗位所需的人数大很多。就好比,第一年 100录取40 ,第二年90 录取40,虽然百分比在下降,但是实际上supply依旧是充足的。
考察:定语修饰;单复数指代
只有WHETHER可以表示是否,IF不可以, GMAC认为在宾语从句中用if有歧义
In sum, although Nightingale may not have achieved all of her goals during the Crimean War, her breadth of vision and ability to realize ambitious projects have earned her an eminent place among the ranks of social pioneers.
none of C-E can work because we don't have a "possible workshop." We have a place that may (possibly) have been a workshop.
an alliance that advanced the cause of civil rights. 战争期间的 贸易联盟,促进了civil right发展
They conclude that the postwar demise of this vital alliance constituted a lost opportunity for the civil rights movement that followed the war. 但是 战争结束以后,alliance终结(demise)了,让civil right 的发展缺少了机会
E 选项 would have benefited (虚拟语气) 本可以继续civil right的发展的
P:有效药来自一种树的树皮,这种树在野外很稀少的,且要很多的树皮才能产生一点药
C:持续的生产药会导致树灭绝
削弱方向:持续生产不会导致树灭绝
选项E:如果largely inaccessible的话,就没办法使药品continued production,谈论的点偏离了,应该关注的是持续生产会不会导致灭绝
选项D:没选D是觉得还需要一点脑补,即人们会使用cutting的方式培养。实际上,D直接给出了不会导致灭绝的方法。
The idiom says “not so much X as Y”.
Only C follows the above idiomatic structure.
…not so much because of the insights of great thinkers as because of…
In B, the above idiom is followed but parallelism is violated through
“…because of…the result of…”
In A, D, and E “…not so much X but Y…” is not idiomatic.
The sentence contains a comparison introduced by not so much. However, the comparison is executed with correct idiomatic usage only in one of the answer options.
As written, the comparison not so much . . . but . . . is incorrect. This is also true in choices D and E.
我推荐大家多去看看国外论坛的分析,一般都比国内的老师分析的到位
而民众受到伤害要根据犯罪率的绝对值来计算。题目只给出了变化率。