rc
这个不是方案推理吧?文章不是评估了这个方案吗
rc
rc
概率+分步法:
另,看过OG2019的解释,出发点不是of和’s的区别,而是so在indicate程度是,是需要一个完整的clause(含SV)来说明具体的程度。能否推断gmac并不喜欢so……as to的用法呢?
为什么不是因果推理呢..
hopefully没有it is hoped 正式.好吧。。。
enough不能修饰satiated吗?
我来试着翻译一下这句话:
1、从属连词可以引导完整的句子作状语从句,也可以引导现在/过去分词,作状语从句
twice后面可以直接接名词
per capita人均
(b) and (c) are incorrect because of the tense used; "has dated" implies that this is not the case anymore. (this particular construction really only makes sense in the present tense -- or as an -ing modifier attached to a present-tense clause, since -ing modifiers adopt the tense of the clause to which they are attached.)
RON:if you were to replace "both" with "each" in the correct answer, you would have another correct answer.
for any number t in the set, t + 2 is in the set,对于集合里的任意数字(用t来代表这个数字),这个数字的+2(t+2)也在集合里。
【reason是动词,思考】
c
在(D)(E)中,比较的两者为时态有误
注意have done与have been的区别B至少改为have set以平衡than