只有第一段最后一句提了一下而已。可是后面文章的反驳都没有提到了，这也算？那我就觉得D那个combination可以接受诶。

答案D至少是补充说明了，有例子证明左大脑有语言中枢的，stroke了以后会damage至少一边。

文章是在讲环境恶化吗？文章不是在讲amphibian的数量下降和灭绝吗？什么鬼啊。。。

1. idioms: try to do. b中try and recover逻辑上不平行，try uranium?不对，排除b。d中try for也不对，排除d
2. idioms: recover from. not "recover out of",排除c/d
剩下a/e, e中worthwhile to try就可以了，后面的to do有点redundant. sth may be worthwhile to try. try后面的宾语又是该句的主语，这就变成了“sth may be worthwhile to try sth“--> redundant.
最后剩下a.

Again, such simplifications and obscurities exist in order to give prominence to the depiction of sharply delineated moral values, values derived from a character’s purely personal sense of honor, rather than, as in a Jamesian novel, from the conventions of society.

Indeed, most twentieth-century commentators regard Melville not as a novelist but as a writer of romance, 这是第一段中critics的观点，后面坐着承认了Melville是浪漫主义，但又说这不是硬伤，只是表达自己的方式不同，完美对应E

最后一句有parallel，"and lowering the heat" which shows us slowing, instead of slows, 所以排除 B和E
"in which thin layers of extra paper are used "= thin layers of extra paper are used in a cigarette" 所以要用in不是for or that.

be likely to.. 不能省略be

but不是和同位语从句平行

(a) the lake holds..., more than ... combined. correct

problem in choice (e), which implies that lake baikal itself is somehow "more than all the North American Great Lakes combined". that doesn't make sense. →the fresh water才是比较对象
problem in choice (d), this is a direct comparison:(amount of water) IS MORE THAN (specific lakes) that's an illogical comparison; you can't compare a numerical amount of water (a numerical quantity) to a lake (a physical object).

被request的是increase，不是wages。。。。呃。。。

a选项：划线部分的were和之前的were重复了，一个句子只能有一个谓语动词，或者需要连词and把两个谓语动词隔开。

固定句型，just as A do B，so C do D

e选项，rates和exceeds主谓不一致，错误；而且rates和immigrants‘ 使用了双重所有格，错误。

还有一个易错点，就是the budget就是the money，所以it不存在指代不清的问题。

demand+that句型需要用虚拟，所以动词应该为原型，is应该为be。