B. Jamal's response indicates that our prehistoric ancestors were far more active than we are. This suggests not that Sasha is incorrect in her statement, but that her conclusion would benefit from this qualification: a diet high in animal protein and fat is healthy when one engages in intense physical activity at a level that is higher than what is normal for modern human beings. Jamal is providing new pieces of Information which Sasha is missing.
If Comput-o-Mart's customers require only basic computing and Comput-o-Mart sells only advanced computers, then it follows that Comput-o-Mart's customers are likely to pay for computing power that they do not need.
A & B& E are incorrect because "their" is referring to societies but that is illogical because it is people in the societies and not the soiciety itself that can have blood pressure.
he normally preferred form would be "societies in which..."
BUT,
in this sentence, if you write that, then you have
"...IN societies IN which..."
...which is bad.
A.&E-This choice lack parallelism and is unidiomatic (more for X rather than for Y is incorrect). The correct comparison is more for X than for Y.
B&D.-By eliminating the "for" prior to "the dollar bill," This choice creates an ambiguity: Is the dollar coin being used more as a substitute for four quarter than for the dollar bill, or is the dollar coin being used more than the dollar bill as a substitute for four quarters?
与题目无关,就是想总结一下
prefer A to B - 比起A更喜欢B
prefer A over B - 喜欢A也喜欢B但程度上更喜欢A
prefer to do A rather than do B - 宁可做A也不做B
prefer to do A than to do B - 宁可做A也不做B
下次选完要把正确选项带回原文再通读一遍,不然很容易在各选项的对错分析中忽略掉了句子的整体性。
替换:
当what引导名词性从句时,其所指的名词通常是单数,谓语动词也是单数。但有时因谓语动词之后有复数名词,谓语动词也可以用复数。
因为what指代那个东西,其是单数还是复数本身是不清楚的,所以通常指单数。而主宾单复数不一致时谓语动词跟主语走,所以即便宾语是复数,what引导的主语从句谓语动词也可以是单数。参考句子:The only thing my father left me was a few books=What my father left me was a few books. 这里也可以变成The things my father left me were a few books=What my father left me were a few books.
B是这句话的内容,不是这句话的作用
The outdoor advertising spokesperson responds to the city resident by citing an objective test that shows the factual claims of the resident to be false.
种植间距缩小一倍,导致每株植物的yield下降,虽然种植数量也almost扩大了一倍(alomost基本上还抵消不了),但这个yield下降加上这个alomost基本上就不可能double profit了
B:前面一半对(陷阱),后面一半错了。文章没有将lone wolf decision和1871 action作比较
E:类似于“引出下文”的作用
Jane Austens根据后面选项对比可知是复数,故用there were
when-following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs-Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes.
THHINK SIMPLE
Assuming that you as a customer need only basic computing capacity, then its certain that you have to pay extra money
shortly after Lone Wolf, the federal government totally abandoned negotiation and execution of formal written agreements with Indian tribes as a prerequisite for the implementation of federal Indian policy. Many commentators believe that this change had already occurred in 1871
A. so as to 的主语是句子的主语,压土机本身不会浪费水
C. 不是there is no wasted rainwater 而是 there is no rainwater wasted
D. and应连接两个句子
E. 根据句子逻辑应该是前面导致后面的发生,故应用so that 连接较好
主语period,排除BCE,what在从句中做主语,用is。选D
还有一点,做到这里感觉gmat关于这种一增一减的选项基本上都是避开不选的。从前面的种植间距30英尺到15英尺,每亩种更多,但存活率更低/再到前面的fare减少,但客户增多/再到这里的用餐时间减少接待客户增多,但点单减少/
他们好像都不是正确答案......以后看见这种一增一减的选项一定要好好看一下是否存在漏洞
创造了新的consciousness----改变了一些东西才能创造新的